Annex_VIII_CaseStudy0704_SaltoCaxias_Brazil.pdf

(85 KB) Pobierz
IEA Hydropower Implementing Agreement Annex VIII
Hydropower Good Practices: Environmental Mitigation Measures and Benefits
Case Study 07-04: Resettlement – Salto Caxias Project, Brazil
Key Issues:
7-Resettlement
13-Improvement of Infrastructure
Climatic Zone:
Cfa: Humid Subtropical
(Mild with no dry season, warm summer)
Subjects:
- Resettlement Programme for 600 families
- Partnership between the Developer and Local People
Effect:
- Improving Quality of Life after Resettlement
- Increase of Harvest and Land Improvement
Project Name:
Salto Caxias Hydropower Development Project
Country:
Brazil
Implementing Party & Period
- Project:
Campanhia Paranaese de Energia (COPEL)
1995 (Commencement of Construction) -
- Good Practice:
Campanhia Paranaese de Energia (COPEL)
1995 –
Key Words:
Resettlement Programme, Partnership between Developer and Affected People
Abstract:
Among the pertinent environmental aspects was the relocation of 600 families affected by the
construction of the Salto Caxias Hydroelectric Power Plant, with a UHE of 1,240 MW, built by
COPEL in the Municipal district of Capitao Leonidas Marques, State of Parana, Brazil. The
families were relocated in 10 farms constituting 19 associations of rural procedures. In
addition to reallocation of land, an entire infrastructure was built, composed of 600 houses
and store-rooms, 322 km of water system, 415km of roads, 11,690 hectares of soil
preparation, electrical networks and rural telephony, as well as education and health systems.
Nowadays, they serve as national standard.
1. Outline of the Project
State owned electric utility Campanhia Paranaese de Energia (COPEL) supplies powers throughout the
southern part of Brazil. COPEL owns 18 electric power plants, i.e. 17 hydro and 1 thermal as of the
end of 1990. It was recognized in the beginning of 1990s that rapid growth of electricity consumption
would require further electricity supply without delay. Thereupon, COPEL planned to construct Salto
Caxias hydropower plant on the River Iguacu in the state of Parana, Brazil.
Salto Caxias hydropower plant is the fifth hydropower plant on the River Iguacu and it located on the
most downstream of all between the cities of Capitao Leonidas Marques and Nova Prata do Iguac.
Salto Caxias dam is 68 m high, 1,100 m long, and has created a reservoir covering 180 km 2 . The dam
1054534511.051.png
is a gravity roller-compacted (RCC) type.
Construction works began in January 1995. The first of four turbines went on-line in February 1999
and the final unit entered into commercial services before the end of 1999. Projected average annual
output from Salto Caxias hydropower plant will be 5,431 GWh.
In consequence of the completion of Salto Caxias, hydropower plants on the river Iguac will provide
more than 6,500 MW of capacity, which is almost 40% of COPEL’s total installed capacity.
Table 1 Specifications of Salto Caxias Hydropower Project
Item
Specification
Construction Period
1995 - 1999
Power Plant
Max. Output
1,240 MW (310 MW x 4 nos.)
Max. Discharge
Effective Head
Dam
Type
Roller Compacted Concrete Dam
Height
67 m
Crest Length
1,100 m
Catchment Area
Reservoir
180 km 2
Water Surface Area
Gross Storage Capacity
Effective Storage Capacity
Fig.2 Location of Salto Caxias
Hydropower Project
2. Major Impacts
A reservoir newly created by Salto Caxias dam extends its area to 180 km 2 . Consequently, 600
families living near the small town of Foz do Chopim were faced forced eviction. The affected
families formed a small group, so called “Comissao Regional de Atingidos por Barragens do Iguacu
(CRABI)” - (Regional Commission of Affected People by Dams Construction in the River Iguacu),
and claimed damages against COPEL for their forced eviction.
2
1054534511.062.png 1054534511.063.png 1054534511.064.png 1054534511.001.png 1054534511.002.png 1054534511.003.png 1054534511.004.png 1054534511.005.png 1054534511.006.png 1054534511.007.png 1054534511.008.png 1054534511.009.png 1054534511.010.png 1054534511.011.png 1054534511.012.png 1054534511.013.png 1054534511.014.png 1054534511.015.png 1054534511.016.png 1054534511.017.png 1054534511.018.png 1054534511.019.png 1054534511.020.png 1054534511.021.png 1054534511.022.png 1054534511.023.png 1054534511.024.png 1054534511.025.png 1054534511.026.png 1054534511.027.png 1054534511.028.png 1054534511.029.png 1054534511.030.png 1054534511.031.png 1054534511.032.png 1054534511.033.png 1054534511.034.png 1054534511.035.png 1054534511.036.png 1054534511.037.png 1054534511.038.png 1054534511.039.png 1054534511.040.png 1054534511.041.png 1054534511.042.png 1054534511.043.png 1054534511.044.png 1054534511.045.png 1054534511.046.png 1054534511.047.png 1054534511.048.png 1054534511.049.png 1054534511.050.png 1054534511.052.png 1054534511.053.png 1054534511.054.png 1054534511.055.png 1054534511.056.png 1054534511.057.png 1054534511.058.png 1054534511.059.png
3. Mitigation Measures
COPEL received the claim of CRABI and accepted it faithfully. Thereafter, COPEL entered into a
lively discussion with CRABI in order to agree a resettlement programme. The agreement, which built
up the guidelines and approaches of resettlement programmes, was executed in October 1993.
Then, COPEL, on its own initiative, supported to set up a “Group for Multi-disciplinary Studies” with
participation of 140 organizations, including rural worker’s associations, universities, representatives
from the state environmental authority, the public justice ministry the state of Parana’s legislative
assembly, etc.. This “Group for Multi-disciplinary Studies” played a vital role in securing a democratic
forum for discussion about various issues, including but not limited to the social, economic, traditional
culture. This step was very important as a means of ensuring that the project would be implemented in
accordance with the best environmental conservation techniques. It was also social commitment to
guarantee that affected people would be able to participate in the resettlement programme during the
planning, decision making and execution of the project.
The Agreement required that COPEL should comply with the following assignments.
- COPE should conduct the resettlement programme so as to promote social justice and to prevent
rural exodus.
- COPEL should ensure the fair solution in the resettlement process for minor proprietors and
lessees, proprietors without title deed, other workers and farmhands who were directly impaired
by the reservoir.
- COPEL should only acquire resettlement lands with the consent of people to be evicted.
- Family and relative groups will be taken into consideration as well as neighbor’s relationship.
- Each lot of land to be acquired should not be less than 17 hectares per family.
- The lands to be acquired should be more fertile than those condemned.
- The size of each lot of land should be determined taking account of the family work force, and
quality of soil for cultivation.
- A legal conservation area of 20 % of acquired land should be maintained in each lot. In addition, a
defined lot for an experimental agricultural project should be nominated, for which financial
support would be provided.
- A plan for agricultural exploitation and improvement of quality of soil for cultivation soil should
be developed and implemented.
- A complete infrastructures, i.e. roads, fresh water supply, electricity, telephone network, houses,
community centers, schools, etc. should be provided.
Once a partnership between COPEL and CRABI had been established, COPEL took a first step in
implementing the resettlement programme. Lands were acquired on the basis of the regional climate,
terrain, soil type and its agricultural suitability. Current use of acquired lands were mapped and
available information, including superficial and underground water, were evaluated. In promoting the
collaboration and dialogue between COPEL and CRABI, the involvement of CRABI facilitated the
data acquisition.
The main goal of the resettlement programme was to obtain lands suitable for farming and keeping
cattle by ecologically sound methods of production.
Conservation of Existing Forests
An important issue was how to conserve the existing forests on a parallel with the development of new
3
farm lands. Only minimum vegetation was removed and natural vegetation classified as forest could
be preserved. Approx. 300,000 saplings of native species were replanted on wastelands degraded by
previous owners in order to comply with the requirements under the agreement.
Improvement of land use
Land grading work was carried out in accordance with modern soil conservation techniques. This
included 375 km of terraces along the contour lines and 450 km of passes in order to avoid erosion and
pollution of existing springheads and rivers within acquired lands. It should be noted that people to be
resettled participated in this work as a member of CRABI together with hired contractors, having a
budget made available to them by COPEL.
Sustainable Agriculture
Agricultural production system in the area close to the future reservoir had been based on the
conventional techniques that had a great environmental impact through the use of pesticides, highly
soluble fertilizers, hormones and antibiotics. These practices had seriously affected the environment,
specially water, soil and biodiversity.
Such method of production had been demonstrated to be unsustainable economically, socially and
environmentally. To remedy this situation, COPEL had trained a technical team and concentrated
efforts on encouraging, with strong participation of CRABI, to change to organic method of
production. Besides an education programme and awareness-raising for families, several trials were
carried out and they showed more positive results than expected.
Education
An education programme with two centers for 980 students was established. It developed a special
education programme including both classroom activities and community projects. The programme
contributed to the development of a new cooperative working method, making people aware of
environmental preservation with commitment from public institutions. It also promoted decentralized
and democratic management. It benefited young people and adults trough the addition of such subjects
as rural sociology, psychology of human relationships, and philosophy alongside the regular
curriculum disciplines.
Health
Two health centers were set up for the 600 families as well as a family doctor programme, which
promotes preventative medicine to replace the traditional medical practices.
4. Results of the Mitigation Measures
The resettlement works on site were conducted during the period between 1996 and 1998.
The total cost of the resettlement amounted to US$ 56,410,000 (1.95 Real per US dollar) for which
COPEL bore all the cost.
In recent years, COPEL and CRABI are promoting annual cultural events. The cultural festival with
cultural, folk, religious, dance and theatrical exhibitions seeks to preserve the region’s cultural and
social heritage. Each cultural event attracts almost 5,000 participants including resettled people,
representatives of the authorities, universities and other organizations.
4
5. Reasons for Success
The resettlement programme had as one of its purposes the promotion of deep discussion about;
- The way to use natural resources
- Process, including rural development, that are oriented toward the future
- Being aware of the shortage of natural resources, mainly water
- The possibility may offer an improvement of the quality of life and economic growth
The results of the resettlement programme have shown that a partnership between COPEL and CRABI
had been very successful. In this case, CRABI’s willingness to work with COPEL on implementing
the resettlement programme was essential in achieving such successful results. It is important to point
out that CRABI and other NGO continue to work on motivating people in the areas of agricultural
improvement, agricultural science, water management and the values of life within a rural community.
6. Further Information
6.1 References
1)
Salto Caxias hydroelectric Power Plant, Brazil
The web site for the power industry, industry project
( http://www.power-technology.com )
2)
The Role of Hydropower in Sustainable Development, IHA White Paper (Feb.2003)
3)
GIS Management of Socially Affected Areas by Constructions of Hydroelectric Power Plants
(http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc03/p1033.pdf)
6.2 Inquiries
Gilmar Schwanka (e-mail: gil@copel.com )
Noel Massinhan Levy (e-mail: noel@copel.com)
Environmental Administration Team
Environmental and Sociopatrimonial Management Department
Companhia Paranaese de Energia (COPEL)
Rua Jose Izidoro Biazetto 158, Mossungue
CEP 81200 Curitiba, Parana,
Brazil
This case history of hydropower good practice is published for educational and informational purposes only and
may not be used for any other purpose. Duplication for commercial purposes is prohibited. The author(s) of this
publication make no express or implied warranties concerning this case history, including no warranty of accuracy
or fitness for a particular purpose.
New Energy Foundation, Japan, 2006
C
5
1054534511.060.png 1054534511.061.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin