stent system.pdf

(735 KB) Pobierz
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.209
Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162–163 (2005) 196–202
Biomechanical analysis of stent–oesophagus system
W. Kajzer , M. Kaczmarek, J. Marciniak
Institute of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Konarskiego 18a, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Abstract
The paper presents the biomechanical analysis of a stent–oesophagus system. In particular, stresses and strains for the oesophageal stent
(Z-type) reflecting its implantation technique were calculated. The obtained results are the basis for the optimization of the geometrical features
of the stent and mechanical properties of the metallic biomaterial.
© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biomaterials; Oesophageal stent; Finite element method
1. Introduction
repositioned. The second disadvantage is the tumor ingrowth
causing restenosis. In the new generation of oesophageal
stents, that problem was eliminated by silicon-covered stents
[3] . However, the effectiveness of self-expanding stents was
confirmed in long-term clinical examinations [4–11] .
A basic indication for oesophagus stenting is non-
resectable oesophagus tumor or benign obstruction. A
stenting technique is relatively simple and ensures a direct
and lasting therapeutic effect. This method of treatment
must be taken into consideration in 60% of the patients with
an oesophagus cancer recognition. Nowadays, two types of
stents are widely used. The first group are conventional stents
(plastic)—a characteristic feature of this type of stents is a ne-
cessity of a dilation of oesophagus lumen because the diame-
ter of a stent is constant. The main disadvantage of this type of
stent is that these bulky devices require general anesthesia for
the placement and have a high complication rate. The second
group are metallic stents made of the Cr Ni Mo stainless
steel or shape memory alloys. The advantage of these stents
in comparison to plastic ones is the smaller diameter. Thanks
to this, a large dilation of the stricture is not required what
reduces a risk of the oesophagus wall injury. Furthermore, the
small diameter makes the stent “trackable”. Clinical data have
shown that the percentage of serious complications connected
with the conventional stents is 47% whereas the use of the
self-expanding stents causes only 16% of the complications.
The effectiveness in patency reaches 90% and almost 100% in
relation to oesophageal fistulas [1,2] . However, there are two
basic problems related to the application of self-expanding
stents. When the stent is expanded, it cannot be removed or
2. The aim of the work
The aim of the work was the biomechanical analysis of
the given geometrical form of the oesophageal stent used in
the digestive system treatment. A three-dimensional model of
the stent implanted into the oesophagus and the mechanical
parameters of the stent were used to evaluate the relationship
between the stent and the oesophagus tissue [12–14] . The
performed analysis concerned the stresses and strains distri-
bution in the elements of the modeled system. The research
connected with the experimental verification enables to work
out the physical model, taking into consideration the physi-
ological conditions of a human. The obtained results are the
basis for the optimization of the geometrical and material
features of the stents and at the same time, they allow to set
the conditions useful for the implantation technique.
3. Methods
3.1. Geometrical model of the stent–oesophagus system
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: wojciech.kajzer@polsl.pl (W. Kajzer).
In order to carry out the biomechanical analysis with the
use of the finite element method, a geometrical model of
0924-0136/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.209
4966954.010.png 4966954.011.png 4966954.012.png
W. Kajzer et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162–163 (2005) 196–202
197
model of the oesophagus was in the form of the thin-walled
pipe of the following parameters [16] : the inner diameter
d wn = 24 mm, the thickness of the wall g sp = 3 mm, the length
of the oesophagus l p =40mm.
Fig. 1. The model of the oesophageal stent used in the FEM analysis.
Fig. 2. The model of the oesophagus.
the oesophageal stent was worked out. The following pa-
rameters were set [15] : the length of the stent l = 120 mm,
the length of the reflux valve l z = 80 mm, the diameter of
the stent wire d d = 0.37 mm, the thickness of the plastic
layer g = 0.3 mm, the diameter of the stent in the distal
part d 1 = 25 mm, the diameter of the stent in the middle
part d 2 = 18 mm. These stents are made of the austenitic
stainless steel. The stent was covered with the plastic layer
( Fig. 1 ).
In order to analyze the stent–oesophagus system, a geo-
metrical model of the oesophagus was also worked out. The
Fig. 3. The SOLID95 finite element.
Fig. 4. Discrete model of: (a) the oesophagus; (b–d) the oesophageal stent;
and (e) the stent–oesophagus system.
4966954.013.png 4966954.001.png 4966954.002.png
198
W. Kajzer et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162–163 (2005) 196–202
The length of the oesophagus model was equal to the single
segment of the stent increased in both the directions of 10 mm
( Fig. 2 ).
3.2. Discrete model of the stent–oesophagus system
In order to perform the finite element analysis, a mesh-
ing of the geometrical model of the implant was done. The
SOLID95 finite element was used ( Fig. 3 ). This element al-
lows to take into consideration the physical non-linearities
and large displacements.
The discrete model of the stent and the oesophagus is
presented in Fig. 4 .
Due to the repeatability of the structure, the calculations
were carried out for the single segment of the stent (distal
part). In the analysis, the two stages were applied. The first
stage was a clamping of the stent up to the diameter which
allows to insert the stent into the oesophagus. The second
stage was a slow expansion of the stent up to the initial di-
ameter, a contact between the stent and the oesophagus and
then the elastic work of the stent with the oesophagus. The
Fig. 5. Stresses distribution in the oesophageal stent (MPa), the radial dis-
placement, 7.5 mm: (a) the stent and (b) the plastic layer.
100%), the radial
displacement, 7.5 mm: (a) the plastic layer and (b) the stent wire.
×
Fig. 7. Radial displacements (mm) during the work of the system: (a) the
stent–oesophagus system; (b) the stent; and (c) the oesophagus.
Fig. 6. Strains distribution in the oesophageal stent (
4966954.003.png 4966954.004.png 4966954.005.png
W. Kajzer et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162–163 (2005) 196–202
199
simulation of the clamping and the expansion was performed
in the displacemental manner.
4. Results
4.1. The analysis of the stent–oesophagus system
4.1.1. The first stage—clamping of the stent up to the
diameter which enables to insert the stent into the
oesophagus
The stresses and strains in the elements of the oesophageal
stent for the given radial displacement equal to 7.5 mm are
presented in Figs. 5 and 6 . The aim of the idea of the ra-
dial displacement was the diameter reduction of the distal
part of the stent of 15 mm. It allowed to implant the stent
into the oesophagus. The obtained stresses were in the range
0–1213 MPa ( Fig. 5 ) and reached the maximum value in the
bent regions of the stent. The stresses distribution for the
plastic layer are presented in Fig. 5 b. The stresses were in
the range 0–8 MPa. The analysis of the model has shown that
100%) during the work of the system: (a) the
stent–oesophagus system; (b) the stent; and (c) the oesophagus.
×
the strains were in the range 0–201% ( Fig. 6 a). The high-
est strains were localized in the plastic layer bordered on the
metallic segment in the bent region. The strains distribution
for the metallic segment is presented in Fig. 6 b. The maxi-
mum values were equal to 1%.
Fig. 8. Stresses distribution (MPa) during the work of the system: (a) the
stent–oesophagus system; (b) the stent; and (c) the oesophagus.
Fig. 10. Stresses distribution of the oesophageal stent (MPa), the radial dis-
placement, 7.5 mm.
Fig. 9. Strains distribution (
4966954.006.png 4966954.007.png
200
W. Kajzer et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162–163 (2005) 196–202
Fig. 11. Strains distribution (
×
100%) in the single segment of the oe-
sophageal stent.
4.1.2. The second stage—slow expansion of the stent up
to the initial diameter, the contact between the stent and
the oesophagus and the elastic work of the stent with the
oesophagus
In the next step, the geometrical features of the stent during
the expansion in the oesophagus were analyzed. The expan-
sion was realized with the use of the radial displacement up
Fig. 13. Stresses distribution (MPa) during the work of the system: (a) the
stent–oesophagus system; (b) the stent; and (c) the oesophagus.
to the total expansion of the stent. The stresses, the strains
and the displacements in the stent–oesophagus system are
presented in Figs. 7–9 . The analysis has shown that the ra-
dial displacements, after the total expansion of the stent, were
in the range 0–0.69 mm ( Fig. 7 a). The maximum radial dis-
placements in the stent were equal to 0.2 mm ( Fig. 7 b) and in
the oesophagus were 0.69 mm ( Fig. 7 c). The stresses were in
the range 0–247 MPa ( Fig. 8 a and b) and the maximum val-
ues were localized in the bent region of the metallic segment.
The stresses distribution in the oesophagus was in the range
0–2.6 MPa ( Fig. 8 c). The strains were in the range 0–27%
( Fig. 9 a and b). The highest strains for the layer were local-
ized at the ends of the analyzed segment. Fig. 9 c shows the
strain distribution in the oesophagus.
4.2. The analysis of the stent wire–oesophagus system
Fig. 12. Radial displacements (mm) during the work of the system: (a) the
stent–oesophagus system; (b) the stent; and (c) the oesophagus.
4.2.1. The first stage—clamping of the stent up to the
diameter which enables to insert the stent into the
oesophagus
The boundary conditions were the same as for the first
variant and the radial displacement of 7.5 mm were set. The
4966954.008.png 4966954.009.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin