Hitlers Declaration Of War Against The United States.pdf

Bringing History Into AccordWith the Facts in the Tradition of Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes

the Barnes Review

A J OURNAL OF N ATIONALIST T HOUGHT & H ISTORY

M AY /J UNE 2004

V OLUME X

N UMBER 3

T ABLE OF C ONTENTS

4 ADOLF HITLER AT NUREMBERG

42 AVARICE OF THE ROCKEFELLERS

S TEPHEN J. M ARTIN

John D. Rockefeller wanted one thing in the late

1870s: complete control over all oil reﬁning in

America. His techniques employed to achieve this goal

were less than moral. One of our most popular writers

speaks out and exposes the Rockefeller family for

what they were, and are. . . .

48 THE FED & ‘THE GOLDEN RULE’

W AFFEN SS G EN . L EON D EGRELLE

This is not an article about the so-called “trial” of Nazi

war criminals in 1945-6, but rather a triumphal piece

about the ability of Adolf Hitler to mobilize an entire

country. His rallies at Nuremberg inspired the

German people and are still greatly admired by politi-

cians and public speakers today. . . .

10 HITLER DECLARES WAR

T OM R OSE

One might not completely agree with his conclusions,

but one is forced to acknowledge this ﬁrst rate defense

of the gold standard and the dissolution of the Federal

Reserve. Since World War I, the Federal Reserve has

helped to ﬁnance any and all wars waged by the

American ruining class. . . .

55 THE USS LIBERTY SAGA, PART 1

A S PEECH BY A DOLF H ITLER

There is no question that Hitler’s speech on this occa-

sion summarized his thinking about foreign affairs

and the German role in the world. The lying hypocrisy

of the Allied powers is exposed in this speech, which in

many ways is an expose of their thinking. Here is

Hitler’s declaration of war against the United States

in its original style so that you can see what the much-

misinterpreted Hitler actually said were his reasons

for going to war with a nation he knew would supply

a gargantuan test for his over-taxed military. . . .

20 WAR & NEUTRALITY

R OMEO S TANA

This article, dealing with the early events leading to

the slaughter of 34 American sailors and Marines by

the Israelis, is already set to become the standard of

scholarship about this under-reported massacre. . . .

61 THE USS LIBERTY SAGA, PART 2

A S PEECH BY C HARLES L INDBERGH

The ideology of most of the American Founding Fathers

is echoed in this ﬁne speech by one of America’s great

patriots. The case against continued American aggres-

sion against Japan and Germany is laid out. . . .

24 THE CAMBRIDGE APOSTLES

R OMEO S TANA

Because of its length and complexity, we have divided

up this essay into two parts. This second part of the

USS Liberty saga deals with the testimony of Liberty

survivors and Israel’s denials of deliberate attack.

Their tales of suffering and bureaucratic stonewalling will

shock those who still believe the attack was a “mistake.”. . .

70 JOHN ADAMS TAKES OFFICE

R OBERT L OGAN

How few realize the penetration of Marxists into the

British secret service during the 1930s, and more pre-

cisely, in 1932. This is their sordid tale of social and

sexual perversion. Little do most know, this group of

miscreants was responsible for much of the strife the

world ﬁnds herself in today. . . .

30 JOSEF MENGELE: A NEW LOOK

A S PEECH BY J OHN A DAMS

Here, reprinted as primary source material, is the

position of the Federalists in the young years of the

republic. He deals with the growth of government

power, the power of the states and the rightness of the

Constitution against the attacks of the anti-Feder-

alists. This is extremely important American history.

One wonders why it is rarely read. . . .

74 WHO WAS ANTONIO GRAMSCI?

M ICHAEL M URPHY

It is very rare to hear a Revisionist take on the so-

called “Angel of Death,” Josef Mengele. The problem

with the Allied propaganda machine was that the

Allies were doing the same sort of medical experimen-

tation, which, unsurprisingly, did not surface at the

Nuremberg hearings where Mengele was tried. . . .

36 RHODES & HIS SCHOLARSHIPS

Features:

Personal from the Editor: 2

Editorial— “The Passion”: 3

The Degrelle Memoirs: 4

Nationalist History & Theory: 20

History You May Have Missed: 41

Letters to the Editor: 69

Proﬁle— Antonio Gramsci: 74

J OSEPH C ROSSON

Antonio Gramsci is one of the world’s famous commu-

nist agitators. Few of our modern perversions are

innocent of his hands yet people still admire him. This

is a brief, but effective, summary of his thought and

development, more speciﬁcally against the anti-com-

munist Church of Rome which stood in the way of “bol-

shevization” of the western world. . . .

M ICHAEL C OLLINS P IPER

The Rhodes scholarship is not merely a prestigious

reward for excellence in scholarship, but is agenda

driven. The agenda is the reuniting of England with

the United States. Here’s the proof. . . .

Personal from the Editor

our reaction to the last (March/April 2004) issue was

extremely good, and many readers offered congratulations

on our having dared to say that the historical record on

Adolf Hitler—like many important matters of history—

needs to be brought into accord with the facts.

Every war America has fought since the British invasion of 1812

has been directed by the elite and their press; in no case has war

served the interests of the people who have to ﬁght it or pay for it

since then but in every case the war has made the government

stronger, the bankers and armament manufacturers richer and the

politicians worse. Correcting the record on Hitler and Germany is a

daring task worthy of T HE B ARNES R EVIEW and its readers. We feel

it’s about time scholars looked at Hitler as a human being, not some

sort of personiﬁcation of Lucifer.

We note with embarrassment that the article “Understanding

the Past,” pages 18-20, was unmentioned in the Table of Contents.

However, 4-page reprints are available of the article. See page 23 of

this issue for more on this great piece.

Finally, after long last, we are publishing one of the most under-

read documents of all time: Hitler’s declaration of war against the

United States. In it, Hitler deals with the lies, hypocrisy and pontiﬁ-

cation of the FDR administration.

Leon Degrelle, one of our favorites here, has crafted another mas-

terpiece, but one on a very little-known topic, that is, the mobilization

of the masses. The Nuremberg rallies were just that. They were held

to take the Weimar rabble and turn it into a disciplined ﬁghting force.

This was the apogee of mobilization and it, for better choice of words,

transformed a country, an economy and a nation.

In our Nationalist History section, we are running a third speech

of that great patriot and orator, Charles Lindbergh. We’ve printed

several of his speeches in the past, but these three form a seamless

web of thought on the most important event of the 20th century—

World War II.

You will also meet a particularly vile set of creatures, the com-

munist admiring set of homosexuals known as the Cambridge

Apostles. These spies for the USSR in the 1930s formed their secret

clique to report to their masters, the KGB.

For the very ﬁrst time, a ﬁrst rate writer, Michael Murphy, has

written a defense of a man oddly left out of Revisionist scholarship,

Dr. Joseph Mengele, who suffered precisely for doing the same thing

the Allies were doing. The Western condemnation of Mengele is an

exercise of arrogance to the highest degree.

Speaking of arrogance and pontiﬁcation, our good friend Stephen

Martin gives us a very effective exposé of the ruthless business prac-

tices of the Rockefellers at the end of the 1800s.

Don’t forget, write us to express your own opinions, questions or

denunciations . Send your letters to Editor, TBR, P.O. Box 15877,

Washington, D.C. 20003 or email your electronic letters to barnesre-

view7@aol.com. Also remember to see the ad on the inside back cover

about our exciting TBR writing competition. Three winners will get their

stories published in TBR and receive great prizes as well. It’s something

we want all our subscribers to consider.

THE BARNES REVIEW

Publisher: W. A. C ARTO

Editor: M. R APHAEL J OHNSON , P H .D.

EditorialAssistant: J OHN T IFFANY

Art&ProductionDirector: P AUL A NGEL

ContributingEditors:

R ICK A DAMS

Providence,RhodeIsland

C HRISTOPHER B OLLYN

Berlin,Germany

R OBERT C LARKSON , J.D.

Anderson,SouthCarolina

T REVOR J. C ONSTABLE

SanDiego,California

H ARRY C OOPER

Hernando,Florida

D ALE C ROWLEY J R .

Washington,D.C.

S AM G. D ICKSON , J.D.

Atlanta,Georgia

V ERNE E. F UERST , P H .D.

Farmington,Connecticut

J UERGEN G RAF

Basel,Switzerland

R USSELL J. G RANATA

PalosVerdes,California

A.B. K OPANSKI , P H .D.

KlangLama,Malaysia

R ICHARD L ANDWEHR

Brookings,Oregon

E USTACE M ULLINS

Staunton,Virginia

M ICHAEL C OLLINS P IPER

Washington,D.C.

H ARRELL R HOME , P H .D.

CorpusChristi,Texas

V INCE R YAN

Washington,D.C.

H ANS S CHMIDT

Pensacola,Florida

E DGAR S TEELE

Sandpoint,Idaho

J AMES P. T UCKER J R .

Washington,D.C.

T OM V ALENTINE

Naples,Florida

U DO W ALENDY

Vlotho,Germany

T HE B ARNES R EVIEW (ISSN 1078-4799) is published bimonthly by TBR Co., 645

Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Periodical rate postage

paid at Washington, D.C. For credit card orders including subscriptions, call

1-877-773-9077 toll free to use Visa or MasterCard. Other inquiries cannot be han-

dled through the toll free number. For changes of address, subscription questions,

status of order and bulk distribution inquiries, please call 909-587-6936. All editori-

reprints may be made without permission so long as proper credit and contact infor-

mation are given for TBR and no changes are made. All manuscripts submitted must

be typewritten and doublespaced. No responsibility can be assumed for unreturned

manuscripts. Change of address: Send your old, incorrect mailing label and your new,

correct address neatly printed or typed 30 days before you move to assure delivery.

Advertising : M EDIA P LACEMENT S ERVICE , Mrs. Sharon Ellsworth,

301-729-2700 or fax 301-729-2712. TBR Website: www.barnesreview.org. Email

addresses — Business Ofﬁce: tbrca@unidial.com Editorial Ofﬁce/The Editor:

barnesreview7@aol.com.

POSTMASTER: SendaddresschangestoT HE B ARNES R EVIEW ,

P.O.Box15877,Washington,D.C.20003.

tBR SUBSCRIPTION Rates & Prices

( ALL ISSUES MAILED IN CLOSED ENVELOPE )

U.S.A.

Periodical Rate: 1 year, $46 2 years, $78

First Class: 1 year, $70 2 years, $124

Foreign Countries: All payments must be in U.S. dollars.

Regular Surface: 1 year ,$58 2 years ,$102

Foreign Airmail: 1 year 2 years

Canada and Mexico $72 $130

Western Hemisphere $80 $144

Europe $88 $161

Asia andAfrica $95 $176

Paciﬁc Rim $96 $178

Quantity Prices: 1-3 $10 each

(Current issue U.S.A.): 4-7 $9 each

8-19 $8 each

20 and more $7 each

Bound Volumes: (Most in stock) $99 per year for years 1996-2003 (Vols.II-IX)

Library Style Binder:

$25 each;year & volume indicated.

MAY/JUNE 2004

E D I T O R I A L

as there been enough said on Mel Gibson’s movie

The Passion of the Christ ? There certainly has

been enough hot air from the successors of the

Pharisees to make the environmentalists’ gloom

and doom scenarios come true. Let us begin by saying that

whether this movie offends Jewish people or not is irrelevant.

It is the substance of the ﬁlm that is of the utmost importance.

Christianity is not something

studied; it is a radical change of life-

style. It is a rejection of hedonism

and is about the calming of the pas-

sions that ultimately lead to sin. Therefore, one cannot write on

it objectively. This is the problem: if one thinks that the church

has it right, much in one’s life will change, and some of those

changes might be painful. If one rejects the teachings of the

church, then anything goes, everything is random, and there-

fore, life could be full of the puerile pleasures post-modern

America is now infamous for.

This is the reason that Christianity cannot be

debated; it must either dominate or be suppressed

by one means or another.

The great point of The Passion , the point of the

church, something known by Christians for 2,000

years, is that the cross represents the sufferings of

the ascetic life. Christ’s agonizing death, as well as

his fasting and rejection of material goods are

examples for the Christian life. In other words, in

accepting Christ’s cross, one accepts a transforma-

tion most people would rather avoid.

It is only in this context that one can study

Christianity, and it is also within this context that

one can see The Passion . This is not algebra or

chemistry; this is little else than a challenge to

change oneself, with, as is well known, severe pun-

ishment if one refuses.

Many said the movie was too “gory,” too cen-

tered upon the physical sufferings of Christ to the

point of exaggeration. This particular criticism is hard to

understand, given that Christ was brutally tortured by Roman

troops. The “gore” was simply an attempt to make the tortures

of Christ authentic.

In this era, the Jews seem to be making an even more seri-

ous mistake then they made 2,000 years ago. Now, in their

usual penchant for “winning friends and inﬂuencing people,”

Jews, led by Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League

(ADL), have lined up to condemn the ﬁlm and, therefore, those

who have loved the ﬁlm. Now, the Jews of the New Testament

are not the same group of people that live in Israel today. These

latter are largely descended from Turkic Khazars immigrating

from Russia and Poland. Nevertheless, the problem remains.

The movie is a hit. When your editor came out of the theater,

there were few dry eyes. This movie was emotionally potent

and has captured the hearts, already, of millions who likely

only have rarely thought of the passion in such terms. No

doubt, thousands of conversions will come out of this.

In other words, the ADL lost.

When a series of Jews put out The Temptation of Christ ,

only Christian publications protested. This sort of obnoxious

condemnation the ADL specializes in was nowhere to be found

in Lew Wasserman’s perverse movie.

The movie itself was complex.

Never before had Lucifer been

shown as present during the passion

and subsequent cruciﬁxion. The passion refers to the fact that

Christ, as both human and divine, took upon him the sins of the

entire world, past, present and future. By uniting them to him-

self, he destroyed them, and, in the bargain, destroyed death,

making sure that all human souls live forever, either in heav-

en or hell.

The Passion of the Christ

It is clear however, that the Jewish high priest Caiphas was

everywhere, monitoring the events along with his retinue. He

clearly approved the action, and he argued the “prosecution’s”

case before Pontius Pilate, a man in a terrible position. Pilate

was an obscure local governor at the fringes of the empire. He

clearly did not have the troops to put down a riot, and was

threatened by a Jewish leadership that wanted to report him

to Caesar. Their claim that “they had no king but Caesar” was

a bold and outright lie, for they resented the occupation of the

goyim as did the remainder of the people in the area. Pilate was

portrayed as a sympathetic character, a man with little choice

and even less inﬂuence.

Mel Gibson gave us not merely a powerful movie, but also

gave us a choice, either belief or unbelief, Christ or idolatry, the

physical world or heaven.

THE BARNES REVIEW

Held annually in September from the early 1920s until 1938, the Nazis’ Reichs-

parteitage (“Nuremberg Party Day”) rallies or congresses were designed to show

Germany and the world a German state in lockstep with its leader and his ideology.

(The rallies were actually multi-day events.) Here, ﬂags and soldiers greet Adolf Hitler

as he enters the rally. The rallies offer political scientists perhaps the clearest single

example of the organization of the Nazi regime.

MAY/JUNE 2004

THE DEGRELLE SERIES

Nuremberg

In the National Socialist Mind

By SS Gen. Leon Degrelle

The National Socialist Congress had become an annual session of a giant

parliament composed of a million and a half representatives of the people, coming from

the most varied regions. Politically, it was the most “colossal” (as the Germans say)

expression of democracy that had ever been organized anywhere in the world. Such an

event had never before been seen, and nothing like it would ever afterward be seen again.

The Nuremberg Congress was a unique phenomenon in the political history of Europe.

very year in the month of September Nuremberg

became the mecca of National Socialism. In 1921

it was only a handful of militants following a vir-

tually unknown Adolf Hitler who met there. In

1933 they came in a crowd of 400,000. In 1937

they were a million and a half. From every point

of view, these gatherings were astounding.

Just to transport these million and a half deputies of the

nation, a fantastic amount of railroad equipment had to be

mobilized: 4,000 special trains, tens of thousands of railroad

cars lined up like ants on dozens of kilometers of track. Then

that immense host of people had to be received, to be given

directions and to be fed.

All the hotels of Nuremberg together could hardly shelter

a hundredth part of the participants. And so entire towns of

thousands of tents were erected to shelter these crowds that

were equivalent in number to a hundred divisions of

infantry.

They would need not just a roof, but also hundreds of

mobile kitchens, sanitary facilities, ﬁrst aid stations and

information booths, and thousands of Red Cross nurses. And

all that provided with mathematical precision. Every one of

these human ants had to be able to ﬁnd his tent, his cot and

his food by knowing exactly at every minute where he had to

go, how he was to get there and for what purpose.

Arriving from the most faraway villages of the Reich,

often knowing nothing of the town of Nuremberg, the million

and a half participants couldn’t turn around without know-

ing the exact geographic point and the exact hour where and

when, for example, a youth would ﬁnd the Grand Army of

Youth, a woman her

women’s organizations,

the militant his SA col-

umn, or the worker his

professional organiza-

tion or his section of the Labor Front.

Only German discipline, the German genius for organiza-

tion, could keep this gigantic conglomeration of human

beings from becoming entangled in impossible disorder. Year

after year there would be more participants attending. And

year after year the arrival, the stay, the departure of this fan-

tastic migration would be more ﬂawless.

Moving two or three army corps took a Gen. Gamelin two

or three weeks of shilly-shallying. Here, in just a few hours,

the equivalent of the whole French peacetime army was got

under way. A formidable lesson for future military opera-

tions.

The proof was given and repeated each year that it was

perfectly possible to transport a million and a half soldiers in

a matter of hours without the slightest hitch; that the rail-

roads were capable of moving the entire German army from

one end of the country to the other on schedule to within a

quarter of an hour. Where else had a maneuver like that ever

been organized and performed with such mathematical suc-

cess?

On the return, just as on the arrival, the hundreds of divi-

sions of civilians were lodged and fed. Their participation

was orchestrated. We can look at photos of the period, study

each sequence of the admirable ﬁlm TriumphoftheWill pro-

duced by Leni Riefenstahl in 1934: each human formation is

L EON D EGRELLE

THE BARNES REVIEW

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: