Vol 2 - Structure and Structure Determination 1999.pdf

(2062 KB) Pobierz
400291087 UNPDF
Preface to Volume 2
Once a new natural zeolite is found or a new molecular sieve synthezised,via one
or the other of the methods described in Volume 1 for example, the researchers
face the task of confirming that a novel structure has come into their hands.
However, beyond this basic problem, questions soon arise concerning rather
detailed and subtle structural features.
The classical method of determining crystal structures is X-ray diffraction.
Thus, in Chapter 1 of the present volume, H. van Koningsveld and M. Bennett
provide the reader with information about the enormous progress which has
been made in X-ray structure analysis of zeolites.To a large extent,this is due to
outstanding developments in both experimental techniques and methods of
data evaluation, such as the application of synchrotron radiation and Rietveld
analysis. New methods now enable crystallographers to study very small single
crystals or crystallite powders.This is extremely important with respect to most
of the synthetic micro- and mesoporous materials since the size of primary par-
ticles is usually in the µm range. The authors stress that, in the context of
reliable structure analysis, the determination of the unit cell and space group is
of paramount importance. Modern tools now allow researchers to study subtle
effects on zeolite structures such as those caused by framework distortions,
dealumination, isomorphous substitution or cation and sorbate location.
The study of structures containing light atoms is the particular domain of
neutron scattering, even though this is not its only advantage. The authors of
Chapter 2, A.N.Fitch and H.Jobic demonstrate the way in which neutron scatter-
ing is able to complement structure analysis by X-ray diffraction. In particular,
neutron scattering techniques reveal their strong potential in probing details of
structural arrangements involving hydrogen-containing species (such as water
and hydroxyl groups) as well as determining hydrogen bonds, cation positions,
and the location of adsorbed molecules. Frequently these techniques are suc-
cessfully used for further refinement of X-ray diffraction data.
Chapter 3,written by O. Terasaki ,is devoted to the use of the various kinds of
electron microscopy in the investigation of zeolites and related porous solids.
The author’s contribution focuses on the potential of electron microscopy in
studying crystallite morphologies as well as features of the fine structure, e.g.,
bulk and surface defects; details of the crystal surface (edges and kinks),and,as
such, related to crystal growth; and modification of frameworks. Moreover, the
valuable assistance of electron microscopy in solving new structures is illustrat-
ed by a number of examples.
 
VIII
Preface to Volume 2
Chapter 4 is contributed by W. Depmeier , and it concerns particular pheno-
mena of the structures of zeolites and related solids which are attracting more
and more interest. Such phenomena are, inter alia, phase transitions as well as
mechanisms of reduction in symmetry and volume as a consequence of tilting,
distortion of the whole framework or framework units, modulations of the
framework, and partial amorphization. These are demonstrated by a variety
of instructive examples, and their importance is pointed out in view of, for
example,catalytic,shape selective and separation properties of zeolite materials.
General problems of zeolite structures are dealt with in Chapter 5 which is
jointly authored by W. M. Meier and C. Baerlocher . It includes basic aspects of
zeolite crystallography such as topology, configuration, and conformation of
framework structures. Similarly, the idea of distinguishing zeolites on the basis
of framework densities is presented. The attempts at classification of zeolite
structure types are critically discussed. The authors then describe the inter-
esting concepts of structural characterization via loop configurations and coor-
dination sequences and also reconsider the long-standing question of whether
zeolite framework structures are predictable.
This volume concludes with Chapter 6,a review devoted to industrial synthe-
sis.Contributed by A. Pfenninger and entitled “Manufacture and Use of Zeolites
for Adsorption Processes”, this chapter provides an extremely useful adjunct to
Volume 1 of this series. Important aspects of industrial synthesis are described
and,simultaneously,the characterization and use of zeolites for separation pro-
cesses are discussed.In these respects,Chapter 6 is something of an introduction
to matters which will be extensively dealt with in Volume 5 (Characterization II)
and Volume 7 (Sorption and Diffusion) of this series.
The originally planned final chapter on the role played by solid state NMR
spectroscopy in the elucidation of structural features of microporous and meso-
porous materials was unfortunately not available at the time of going to press.
However, given the importance of this topic, an appropriate treatment of this
area is intended to appear in Volume 4 (Characterization I).
Thus,Volume 2 presents an extended overview over most of the relevant tech-
niques currently employed for investigations into structural properties of
micro- and mesoporous materials and offers in its last contribution a valuable
addition to the topics treated in Volume 1. From this volume it becomes evident
that the various techniques for structure determination are, to a large extent,
complementary and that evaluation of the experimental data,on the other hand,
is profiting much from recent developments in theory and modeling. It is the
Editors’ hope that Volume 2 of the series “Molecular Sieves – Science and
Technology” will provide the researchers in the field of zeolites and related
materials with the necessary awareness of the great potential in modern
methods for structure analysis.
Hellmut G. Karge
Jens Weitkamp
 
Contents
H. van Koningsveld and J. M. Bennett:
Zeolite Structure Determination from X-Ray Diffraction . . . . . . . .
1
A. N. Fitch and H. Jobic:
Structural Information from Neutron Diffraction . . . . . . . . . . . .
31
O. Terasaki:
Electron Microscopy Studies in Molecular Sieve Science . . . . . . . . .
71
W. Depmeier:
Structural Distortions and Modulations in Microporous Materials . . . . 113
W. M. Meier and C. Baerlocher:
Zeolite Type Frameworks: Connectivities, Configurations
and Conformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
A. Pfenninger:
Manufacture and Use of Zeolites for Adsorption Processes . . . . . . . . 163
Subject Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
Author Index Vols. 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
 
Zeolite Structure Determination from X-Ray Diffraction
H. van Koningsveld 1 and J.M.Bennett 2
1 Laboratory of Organic Chemistry and Catalysis, Delft University of Technology,
Julianalaan 136, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands; e-mail: havank@cad4sun.tn.tudelft.nl
2 661 Weadley Road, Radnor, PA 19087, USA; e-mail: JMBXrayse@aol.com
1Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Severe Overlap of Reflections in Powder Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3 Incorrect Determination of the Space Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4 Effect of Framework Flexibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5 Disorder of Non-Framework Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6 Faulting within the Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7 Isomorphous Replacement of Framework Atoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8 Crystal Size Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
9 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1
Introduction
Zeolites and related microporous materials are a class of materials with an ever
widening range of compositions, structures and uses. Since the earliest days of
zeolite science X-ray diffraction has been one of the basic and most useful tools
for characterization.
Initially X-ray diffraction was used to answer simple questions such as:“have
I made a new material?”or:“has the crystallization process gone to completion?”
Now the questions encompass everything that a researcher might want to know
about the structure of a material. Early attempts at determining crystal struc-
tures using X-ray diffraction were often unsuccessful because many of these ear-
ly synthetic materials were available only as powder samples. Fortunately many
of these first synthetic materials had natural counterparts with large single
crystals, and data from these were used to determine the framework structures
Molecular Sieves,Vol. 2
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999
2
H. van Koningsveld · J.M. Bennett
of their synthetic counterparts. Today, the framework of a new material can be
often determined from powder samples. In addition, single crystal techniques
have improved considerably leading to increased accuracy in the bond angles
and bond distances and to the ability to study crystals of much smaller size.It is
now possible for a single crystal study to reveal details of the structure that show
the interaction of a sorbed material with the framework or movement of cations
within the framework and any ensuing distortions of the framework.Structural
data from powder samples are beginning to reveal similar changes in the crystal
structure with temperature, with sorbed materials and even under catalytic
conditions. Even though the technique of X-ray powder diffraction has im-
proved greatly since the early days of zeolite science, it is still more accurate to
determine the crystal structure of a new material from single crystal data rather
than from powder data.
Many of the advances in the structural information derived for zeolitic mate-
rials are a direct result of major improvements in powder and single crystal
X-ray equipment available, in the development of new structure determination
methods and in the use of new characterization tools including magic angle
spinning NMR, neutron diffraction and electron microscopy, which are de-
scribed in subsequent chapters. Two excellent review papers [1, 2] discuss the
use of X-ray diffraction techniques to study zeolites and the problems en-
countered, and it is recommended that they be used in combination with this
chapter.
The stages in determining the crystal structure of a material have been
described as: (i) obtain a suitable sample, (ii) collect the data, (iii) determine a
trial structure using ab initio methods, and (iv) refine the data.
However, with zeolites it is not as simple as the above infers since subtle
changes in the zeolite framework can influence, to a greater or lesser extent,
both the observed intensities and the symmetry. These subtle changes in the
observed intensities and the symmetry can cause serious problems for crystallo-
graphers performing a zeolite structure analysis.The crystallographic problems
include:
– Severe overlap of reflections in powder data leading to problems with the
techniques used to decompose the peaks into individual reflections
– Incorrect determination of the space group especially when the true symme-
try is masked by pseudo-symmetry
– The effect of framework flexibility on the structure analysis
– Disorder of the non-framework species and its effect on the structure
solution
– Faulting within the framework
– Problems caused by isomorphous replacement of framework atoms
– The effects due to small crystal size and the limits on the crystal size that can
be used
In order to help those in the zeolite community to better appreciate the beauty
of an excellent crystallographic study while learning to evaluate the pitfalls that
are present in an incorrect study,several structures,published in the last decade
and that are examples of the problems listed above, will be reviewed.
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin