Citizens for Larouche, The Real Story Behind the Trilateral Commission. The 1980s Plot to Destroy the Nation 1980.pdf

Special Report to the American People

THE REAL STORY BEHIND

THE

TRILATERAL

COMMISSION

The 1980s Plot

to Destroy the Nation

Issued by Citizens for LaRouche

March 1980

This Man is the

Trilateral Commission's

Number 1 Enemy

This is why

"The United States is not a heap of people piled on top of one another. It is a

nation with a proper moral destiny, a mission to perform among nations on

behalf of civilization.

We are going to give every child in this nation a sense of moral purpose—that

they are producing, that they are developing their skills, that they are

producing wealth which is going out from our ports around the world to areas

where people are miserable and hungry and faced with death from famines

and epidemics. That wealth is going to uplift the productive powers of those

people, and we are going to change the world."

Lyndon LaRouche, February 23, 1980

the American People

1. The Real Story Behind

the Trilateral Commission

2. The 1980s Plot to

Destroy the Nation

• How the Trilateral Commission

Created Jimmy Carter 14

• LaRouche: A Carter Presidency

Means War

3. The Trilateral Commission

Dictatorship, 1976-80

4. The Trilateral Commission and

the 1980 Election

Appendices

For Further Reading

A Report to

The Real Story

Trilateral

Commission

As a campaign issue during this election year, the

Trilateral Commission has already had a determining

influence in the New Hampshire, Florida, Alabama,

and Georgia primaries, and it is coming up as a crucial

issue in the Illinois primary.

The Commission is a group of 300 powerful public

figures from North America, Japan, and Western Eu-

rope, formed in 1973 with advice and guidance from

the Council on Foreign Relations and from British

aristocrats, such as the Earl of Cromer of Baring Bros.,

Lord Roll of S.G. Warburg & Co. and director of the

Bank of England, Lord Harlech, Sir Kenneth Keith,

Sir Arthur Knight, and others. One hundred and ten

members of the Commission are Americans, and 27 of

them have served or are now serving in the Carter

administration. This includes President Carter, Vice-

President Mondale, Secretary of State Vance, Secretary

of Defense Brown, and others. David Rockefeller,

Henry Kissinger's piggy bank, is accorded the honor of

calling himself the founder of the Commission.

The candidacy of George Bush is now in ruins

because the candidate has been overidentified with the

Trilateral Commission. John B. Anderson deserves and

probably will get a sound trouncing by the voters for

the same reason as Bush: his long-standing identifica-

tion with the Trilateral Commission.

The electorate knows very little of substance about

the Trilateral Commission, but this is compensated by

the fact that it knows that President Carter was hand-

picked and put into office by the Commission. There-

fore, not without justice, the average informed Ameri-

can citizen identifies the debacles and disasters of the

Carter administration with the Trilateral Commission.

They do not want any of it, and they do not want any

other candidate close to or identified with the Commis-

sion. This year's general election is, on a fundamental

level, fought around the issue of the "Eastern Estab-

lishment's" control over American policymaking insti-

tutions.

This is true even for the Democratic Party primaries

so far. The principal reason why ordinary Democrats

continue to vote for Carter despite his identification

with the Trilateral Commission is the fact that Kennedy,

the liberal lion of the Eastern Establishment, is consid-

ered a worse evil than even the hated Trilateral Com-

mission. The Democratic vote that goes for LaRouche,

for example the 20 percent vote in the New Hampshire

primary, represents the more sophisticated and intellec-

tually tougher voters who have reached the conclusion

that what is worth fighting for in this year's presidential

election is a result which will deny the liberal, anti-

American Eastern Establishment any access whatsoever

Behind the

President Jimmy Carter under the banners of the International Monetary Fund, the

international Development Bank, the International Finance Corporation, and the

World Bank. The issue is not the existence of a conspiracy, but the policy upon

which it acts."

to the Executive of our government. Thus, despite the

notoriety the Trilateral Commission has achieved so

far, the real issue in the election is the liberal Eastern

Establishment, and within this, the Trilateral Commis-

sion draws attention because it is, as it was meant to

be, a more visible instrument of the liberal establish-

ment, for the purpose of drawing to itself the fire of

popular outrage.

Right now, upward of 35 to 40 pamphlets, brochures,

books, and major essays about and against the Trila-

teral Commission are circulating around the country,

totaling millions of copies reaching and informing to

varying degrees (and occasionally misinforming) the

electorate. This publication is now offered to the public

to place the issue of the Trilateral Commission in its

proper perspective, within its proper context of the

liberal Eastern Establishment, to clarify the fundamen-

tal policy issues on which the Eastern liberals pin their

efforts at this time, and to identify the special "point

man" role the establishment has assigned to the Com-

mission.

The liberal Eastern Establishment, for which the

Trilateral Commission is a special-purpose instrumen-

tality for a limited period of time, is a grouping of

powerful families in New York, Boston, Connecticut,

and elsewhere, which exercises permanent control over

the nation's major universities, investment banks, law

firms, and federal civil service, and through them, over

an important number of manufacturing corporations.

This control per se does not necessarily have to be evil

It is the purpose to which it is used, the policy to which

it is used that makes it evil or good.

The Tool of the British Oligarchy

The principal use to which this social power has been

used increasingly since the assassination of President

McKinley and decisively since the accession to power

of President Woodrow Wilson, is to control the foreign

policy of the United States on behalf of the ruling

aristocracy of Great Britain. The Eastern Establishment

itself is not the center of ultimate power, it is an

instrumentality on behalf of policies of the British

oligarchy.

Most Americans, upon being informed of this fact,

react with incredulity, even the most committed anti-

liberals among them. It is however an easily proved

fact. What no American will deny is that all those

policies generally identified as liberal in the domestic

domain, have the unmistakable stench of direct and

outspoken hostility to American nationalism. This is

the case for every domestic policy from the issue of

school prayer, to pledging allegiance to the flag in

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: