Aspden - CYCLOTRON RESONANCE IN HUMAN BODY CELLS (1997).pdf - Energy from the Vacuum - andreas50_54

ES10PAGE0

ENERGY SCIENCE REPORT NO. 10

CYCLOTRON RESONANCE IN HUMAN BODY CELLS

HAROLD ASPDEN

Sabberton Publications

P.O. Box 35, Southampton SO16 7RB, England

Fax: Int+44-2380-769-361

ISBN 0 85056 011 X

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10page0.htm [03/08/01 13:17:51]

ES10PAGE00

ENERGY SCIENCE REPORT NO. 10

CYCLOTRON RESONANCE IN HUMAN BODY CELLS

Section Title ...................................................................................... page

Part I: 1997 Update

Introduction ......................................................................................... 3

Part II: 1990 Review

The Hazard Risk - A U.S. Perspective .............................................. 19

Molecular Mechanisms in Magnetic Medicine ................................. 20

Cyclotron Resonance of Hadronic Ions in Liquids ................... ........ 21

Killing Fields - Solving the Problem of Overhead Power Lines ....... 29

Explanatory Note ............................................................................... 34

The Harwen Blanket Switch - Electric Blanket Solution .................. 35

ELF Radiation and Biological Effects ............................................... 37

Note on the Schumann Resonance ..................................................... 41

Debatable Aspects of Cyclotron Resonance in Ionized Liquids ........ 42

Part III: Appendices

I: Brainwaves and Alpha Rhythm ...................................................... 45

II: Power Lines and Health ................................................................ 49

III: Ionospheric Radiation ................................................................. 51

IV: The Proton Factor and Its Unknown Effects ............................... 54

V: U.S. Patent No. 5,151,577 ............................................................ 67

VI: Living Cells and Superconductivity ........................................ 68-70

*****

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10page00.htm [03/08/01 12:23:27]

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10.htm

CYCLOTRON RESONANCE IN HUMAN BODY CELLS

PART I: INTRODUCTION

There are times when it is necessary to wander slightly from one's field of expertise to trespass briefly

and as a stranger in a discipline that is sending signals into one's own territory.

It has been suggested from evidence in the medical field that overhead electric power lines and electric

blankets can be harmful to one's health and there are those expert in the science of electrical engineering

who argue that low frequency electromagnetic radiation cannot possibly have any harmful effects.

Self-appointed in the quest to reconcile differences of opinion in this debate, I once dared to express my

opinion as an academically-trained electrical engineer as to why overhead electric power lines and

electric blankets can pose a health hazard. My case was based on a combination of two circumstances.

Firstly, I have contended for many years that the whole of our empirical knowledge concerning

electrodynamic interactions is founded on evidence collected from experiments in which the main field

reactions are set up by the motion of electrons. My thesis has been that, where reactions to

electromagnetic fields are seated in heavy mobile ions, rather than electrons, then anomalies do arise.

Indeed, there are anomalous forces set up in some instances, as reported in scientific periodicals of high

repute, which exceed by a thousand fold the theoretical expectation based on electron theory.

Secondly, given that the medical community now suspects that fields set up by overhead electric power

lines can stimulate unwanted activity in human body cells, I ask myself whether the ions in our body

fluids that must react to those fields are electrons as such or are of heavier molecular form. In the latter

case, taking the ions found in water, namely the hydronium ion H 3 O + and the hydroxyl ion OH, I can see

that we are dealing here with the same electrical territory as that in which one experiences those high

force anomalies mentioned above. Clearly, therefore, since the electrical engineer has failed to give

account of the anomalous energy activity witnessed in plasma discharges where heavy ions are the

reacting charge carriers, that engineer has no right to declare that the electromagnetic fields he is

producing cannot be harmful. He simply does not know.

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10.htm (1 of 70) [02/08/01 15:44:01]

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10.htm

All he can be sure about is that people working in the electrical power generation and distribution

industry have no reason to worry about electricity affecting their health, so long as they keep well out of

reach of live wires and their high voltages. He is, incidentally, all too aware of the characteristic smell of

ozone owing to the ionization of air produced by an electrical discharge. It is a warning that something

may be wrong and that he is getting too close to an electrical hazard. However, without such a warning

the question is whether there is a less obvious influence which puts us at risk if we get close to electrical

cables which are spaced apart, one carrying current in one direction and the other carrying current the

opposite direction.

That, by the way, is the feature which overhead power lines and electrical blankets have in common. In

the electrical wiring used in the domestic power supply to electric cookers, electric fires, lighting etc. the

current is not something that flows one way. It has to enter an appliance, do its work and then go back to

its source. In the wiring system wires carrying current to the appliance are twisted closely around the

wires carrying the return current flow. This means that their field effects cancel and the normal domestic

power cable poses no hazard problem so long as the insulation in the cable is sufficient to withstand the

voltages used and the current, which generates heat, is obliged to restrict its damage to blowing an

occasional fuse in the protection system. Our health hazard concern, however, is with those overhead

power lines and electric blankets.

Remember here that the professional electrical engineer who maintains overhead power lines has expert

knowledge of how electricity carried through metal wire by one set of electrons can interact with

electricity carried through metal wire by another set of electrons. That is his trade and he knows it well.

What he does not know anything about is how electricity flowing in the human body and carried, not by

electrons, but by ionic particles, may interact with other such ionic particles in the human body and how

their interaction can be aggravated by the electrical and magnetic fields which that engineer creates by his

power distribution apparatus.

Of course, he will say that he too is human and that his body is exposed to such effects, but then I urge

him to consider whether he really does spend his working days close to overhead power lines which are

energized. If he does, then I wonder how he contrives to do anything useful. Again I stress that here I am

not referring to an energized cable which carries current along conductive strands in close proximity but

in opposite directions. I am referring instead to a situation where he may sit close to, and virtually

between, two widely-spaced electrical power lines each conveying uncompensated currents, as otherwise

there is little field exposure.

Dare I then point out that a baby's bottom, which is commensurate in size with the spacing between metal

wire strands in an electric blanket, is the kind of exposure to unbalanced field effects of the kind which

that engineer rarely, if ever, encounters in his power line work. He is wise enough to switch the power off

before climbing up between those overhead lines.

On the broader subject of electromagnetic fields, we all have exposure to the electromagnetic wave

spectrum, which ranges through its radio and television frequencies, the infra red frequencies and on

through optical frequencies and beyond. We know that if such radiation is concentrated to high intensities

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10.htm (2 of 70) [02/08/01 15:44:01]

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10.htm

then we can suffer. Physicists know that at the high frequency end of the spectrum, as one progresses

through the ultra-violet range, there are X-rays and -rays which can be very harmful. However, for the

very low frequencies used in power cables and the very weak electromagnetic fields they produce,

electrical engineers and physicists see no reason for concern about a radiation hazard.

Yet, as I say, since the basis of electrical science is founded on electrical activity seated in electrons and

our body fluids involve activity seated in ions that are very much heavier than electrons, there is reason

for doubt.

Now, the stimulus for writing the text of this introductory essay of this Report No. 10 comes from a

Letter to the Editor in the July/August 1996 issue of Electronics World (page 590). It was authored by Dr.

David Fisher of Cardiff in Wales and was a declaration framed in an accusative context directed at

anyone who believes in 'anti-gravity and perpetual motion (free energy)' with the finger pointed in my

direction. Quoting from it:

"I was, in fact, thinking of Dr. Aspden who, readers will recall, believes in this nonsense and has also

proposed a 'cyclotron' theory in order to 'explain' the so-called link between electromagnetic fields and

disease."

This was probably a result of an article of mine published by Electronics and Wireless World, pp. 29-31

(1989). It was entitled 'Anti-Gravity Electronics'.

The latter article had also attracted similar criticism, expressing doubts as to my wisdom as a

professionally qualified physicist, for my views on the gravity theme. My attacker was C. Hellingman

writing in Physics Education, 27 , 112-115 (1992). In rallying to defend my case I wrote another article

which was published by the Institute of Physics in U.K. in that same periodical, Physics Education, 28 ,

202-203 (1993). It was entitled 'The Law of Perpetual Motion'. As to my `cyclotron' subject that had

featured in an earlier article of mine in EWWW, pp. 774-775 (September 1991). The title of that article

was 'Power Lines, Cancer and Cyclotron Resonance'. Note that EWWW, or Electronics World +

Wireless World, represents a staged period of gradual transition as the publishers of Wireless World

decided to rename their periodical Electronics World. I am tempted to note here that the word `wireless'

has gone out of fashion, along with the word 'aether', but remind you that Nature still needs the aether to

sustain those wireless waves and no amount of electronics can eradicate its existence!

This being Report No. 10, the final Report in this Energy Science Series, and the other reports all being

concerned with energy matters in the context of electrical power and the fundamental physics involved, I

am now going to digress somewhat in this introduction. Indeed, I have decided to present this Report in

three parts, this Introduction being the first part. If the reader's interest is restricted to the health hazard

issue posed, as by power lines, then the next few pages of this section up to page 9 should be skipped.

I planned to publish and, indeed, did compile, a 28 page document bearing the title of this Report No. 10,

some 7 years ago, in 1990. I was, however, distracted at the time by other pressing interests, such as the

file:///D|/Myweb/reports/ES10.htm (3 of 70) [02/08/01 15:44:01]

Aspden - CYCLOTRON RESONANCE IN HUMAN BODY CELLS (1997).pdf

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: