Excavations at Paphos in Cyprus, 1966.pdf

(553 KB) Pobierz
Excavations at Paphos in Cyprus, 1966
Excavations at Paphos in Cyprus, 1966
Author(s): A. H. S. Megaw
Source: Archaeological Reports, No. 13 (1966 - 1967), pp. 25-28
Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies
Accessed: 28/08/2009 06:30
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Archaeological Reports.
http://www.jstor.org
209574463.004.png 209574463.005.png 209574463.006.png
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
REPORTS FOR 1966-67
EXCAVATIONSAT PAPHOS IN CYPRUS, 1966
Excavation of the Byzantine (and subsequently
Lusignan) castle on the 'Saranda Kolonnes' site was
resumed by the writer on behalf of the British School
at Athens in September I966, with the assistance of
A. W. Lawrence, R. J. C. Jamieson (architect) and
two students of the School, J. Hayes and G. Waywell.
The support of the Russell Trust and the Seven Pillars
of Wisdom Trust is gratefully acknowledged, as well
as the assistance of the Cyprus Antiquities Depart-
ment, which not only lent equipment but also carried
out certain structural restorations, without which
the excavations could not have continued.
The plan of the castle, which had been established
in its main lines in the 1957-59 campaigns for the
Antiquities Department (see AR 1958 33 fig. II),
has now been further clarified as a small residential
fortress within an outer wall (Fig. i). The remains of
the south wall of the castle proper and of its south-
west corner tower were exposed (the latter robbed to
its foundations) and the excavation of the apsidal
gate-tower was completed. More of the granite
columns used to reinforce
the walls were found; it is
to these that the site owes
(Fig. 3 scale / o); and since plain voussoirs
were also found here, at a lower level, the mould-
ed ones doubtless belong to the upper storey of
this tower. Here there may well have been a chapel,
for several blocks with remains of fresco decoration
were found in the neighbourhood.
For the rest of the piano nobile, reached by a staircase
on the south side of the court, there is little evidence.
The pairs of latrines within three of the ground floor
piers were evidently repeated in corresponding
piers on the upper floor, for the shafts descending
from them are preserved. Some of the fallen blocks
indicate that the piers themselves were, in the upper
storey, joined by walls to close the residential ac-
commodation from the open court. The curvature
of several blocks from the springings show that the
upper vaulting was of semicircular section, whereas
the vaulting of the undercrofts was segmental. One
moulded block found near the southwest corner, had
clearly fallen from the upper storey, where it doubt-
less had formed part of the enrichment of a doorway
..---.
2
t.--
PAPHOS- s5ARN KOLONNES -
967
its name.
The last of the nine
massive piers
that
ring
the
(
central
courtyard
were lo-
"
--
cated by extending
the
r
'
excavation
along
its north-
r----
ern side; but here, as in
-
much of the west range, floor
\
\
'
level was not reached. The
' L-
southwest
pier,
encumbered
--
by the collapsed remains of
the vaulting that sprang
from its west face, was par-
!
'
tially restored by the Anti-
.-.---.
quities Department during
the excavation. The rib
that carried the vaulting
between this pier and that
--
to the east was also recon-
*
structed (Fig. 2). Many
voussoirs from such ribs, of
simple rectangular section,
have been found. The posi-
tions of the ribs are not
in doubt and have been
indicated on the plan
(Fig. i); some of the corbels
that carried them remain^
in situ. Only one series of
moulded rib-voussoirs was |
found, in the gate-tower
,
FIG. I
.
209574463.007.png
26
A. H. S. MEGAW
'--------
.- - -
moved, whereasthe north-
west staircase was found
intact.
Mid-thirteenth century
pottery in the disturbed
levels of debris, which
reaches a height of 3 m.
above the floor, connects
the quarrying with the
reconstruction of Paphos
under the Lusignans.
From contexts undis-
turbed since the earth-
i i n S
R
quake much of the
i_tor equipment of the castle
in use in I222 has been
recovered. This includes
tI%ne coarse sgraffitoplates often
with dabs of green, slip-
reoir opainted jugs and a few
specimens of the proto-
maiolica wares of Apulia
and Sicily (Fig. 5). Scat-
tered fragments of By-
zantine twelfth-centurypottery and gilt glass, aswell as
contemporary coins, suggest that this is the Byzantine
castle which surrendered to the English Knights in
1191. Notable are the specimens of a thin ware with
sparse sgraffito decoration reinforced with yellow-
brown colour, which may have been current already
in the late twelfth century (Fig. 6). It has previously
been found in the Baths of Zeuxippus in Con-
stantinople, in South Russia, Corinth and elsewhere.
From historical sources it is known that the
Byzantines maintained a castle in Paphos in the
twelfth century, and that the entire town 'including
the castle' was destroyed by earthquake in I222,
while it was in Crusader hands. But there is no
record of its construction. A search for datable
deposits relating to the building of the castle did not
o
FIG. 2
(Fig. 4). Like the moulded rib-voussoirs they have
a Romanesque flavour, although the moulding
cannot be matched exactly.
In the undercrofts, wherever excavation was
continued to floor level, various unsuspected parti-
tions came to light; also a row of mangers against
the west wall, like those previously found in the east
range. The quarrying of the remains of the castle
which followed its destruction in the eathquake of
A.D. I222 was found to have been erratic. In the
southwest corner, where it had reached the floor,
the seven steps which had led up to the tower on this
I
I
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
----....
.
angle had all been re-
II
209574463.001.png
EXCAVATIONS
AT PAPHOS
27
FIG. 5
yield conclusive results. The foundation trench
along the north face of the northeast tower was
identified. It contained nothing recognisably later
The bulk of the numerous seventh-century Byzan-
tine coins found in the excavations no doubt relate to
that disaster, though one of later date suggests a
Byzantine presence after the Arabs withdrew,
probably in 656. The castle may have been first
constructed by the Byzantines at that stage, to protect
what was their most accessible fleet-base in the Island
against further Arab incursions; but, if so, it would
have been dismantled following the treaty of 688,
when the two parties agreed to demilitarize Cyprus
and divide its revenues. The coin evidence indicates
that from the early eighth century the site long lay
abandoned, while Paphos itself virtually disappears
from recorded history until the twelfth century.
Consequently, the material from the construction
contexts does not conflict with a building date after
the Byzantine recovery in 965, for it is arguable that
in the meantime the buildings which the Arabs
destroyed remained untenanted and that, if the
castle was built after that date, the construction fills
could still contain only seventh-century and earlier
material. There is indeed something to be said for
assigning the castle to the years around IIoo. This
is the time to which the earliest fragments of Byzantine
glazed pottery from the site belong, and the time when
Alexius I is known to have concerned himself with
the security of the Island. At this date the features
of the castle evocative of the Middle Ages would be
less surprising and the survival of antique elements
could be attributed to Byzantine conservatism.
In the Outer Ward, between the castle proper and
the outer wall, the original level has now been re-
established in the southern sector and in much of the
east and west sectors as well. This was made
possible by the previous reconstruction of the inner
face of the outer curtains to the appropriate height
to serve as a retaining wall; for, except at two points,
the curtains had been robbed and eroded well below
Outer Ward level. On the ample terraces thus
formed, the numerous blocks from the fallen super-
structure of the castle have been assembled for
further study. To provide
FIG. 6
than the seventh century. The same is true of a well
previously found outside the south wall, which the
builders of the castle must have encountered but of
which they made no use. The identifiable sherds
so far extracted from the mortar of its walls are
equally of seventh century or earlier date.
It is clear that the castle was erected on the ruins of
the city which the Arabs destroyed in A.D. 653/4.
a safer
repository
for
smaller fragments, the segmental
vault of the base-
209574463.002.png
28
A. H. S. MEGAW
FIG. 7
The position of the main outer gate has not been
established, but a postern has been located in the
flank of the pentagonal tower on the west side. This
leads on to a terrace over a tunnel antedating the
castle and passing under the curtain wall into the in-
terior. The tunnel had naturally been walled-up at the
outer end by the builders of the castle and filled with
stone and rubble. This filling was partly excavated
and found to contain column-drums and a capital from
a Graeco-Roman building and some pottery, again
none of it apparently later than the seventh century.
After the excavation of the remains of the outer
south wall and its central tower had been completed
by conventional methods, much of the debris ac-
cumulated in the ditch outside it was removed with
mechanical equipment. The tower and adjoining
curtain thus exposed rise at this point from a scarped
rock-face (Fig. 7). The floor of the ditch was not
reached but soundings elsewhere indicate that it was
cut to a depth of about 5 m. below ground level
within the wall. Above the rock, the curtain walls
are faced with dressed blocks set in a hard lime-
mortar, but the masonry of the towers is drafted to
leave bosses of varying projection. In this and other
respects the construction of the castle proper is
identical, save that the ashlar blocks of the nine piers
are bedded in gypsum.
Whether the castle was first built around I oo,
or earlier, and whether its 'medieval' features are
contemporary or relate to alterations and additions
(or even possibly to a major reconstruction) during
the 30 years of Crusader occupation, are questions
it is hoped to answer in a further campaign.
ment in the large east tower of the outer wall has
been reconstructed by the Antiquities Department.
During the 1966 campaign the outer wall was also
clarified at several points. The form of all the
towers has now been established; their variety is a
characteristic Byzantine feature. Little has yet been
seen of that on the northwest angle, since it has been
robbed to a great depth. In the curtain adjoining
it to the south was exposed the entrance to a stair
leading down to a sally-port, the sixth such to be
found (a seventh was started but never completed).
These were evidently judged unsafe by the last
occupants of the castle, for all were found walled-up.
The BritishSchoolat Athens
A. H. S. MEGAW
209574463.003.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin