EEWebPULSE_2012_i0052.pdf

(4994 KB) Pobierz
EE Web
PULSE
EE Web.com
Issue 52
June 26, 2012
Beth Cooper
NASA Glenn
Research Center
Electrical Engineering Community
905167259.025.png
EE Web
Electrical Engineering Community
Contact Us For Advertising Opportunities
1.800.574.2791
advertising @ eeweb.com
www.eeweb.com/advertising
905167259.026.png 905167259.027.png 905167259.028.png
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Beth Cooper
NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER
4
Interview with Beth Cooper - NASA Internal Agency Hearing Conservation Consultant
The Development of NASA Auditory
Demonstrations Laboratory for Testing
of Hearing Protection Devices
BY JEFF SCHMITT , BETH COOPER AND DAVID NELSON
9
12
Featured Products
14
Why Can’t Johnny Design? Part 1
BY TOM LEE WITH QUANSER
Examining the teaching methods of the modern day engineering curriculum and the
challenges that engineering students face in the industry.
20
TDR: Reading the Tea Leaves
BY MIKE STEINBERGER WITH SISOFT
A review of the basic techniques for interpreting time domain reflectometry -- an essential
technique for analyzing measured S parameters.
Your Clocks, My Layout
BY BILLIE JOHNSON WITH ON SEMICONDUCTOR
26
A clock tree synthesis primer that is key to understanding how to tackle advanced
clocking requirements and strategies
29
RTZ - Return to Zero Comic
3
EE Web | Electrical Engineering Community
Visit www.eeweb.com
905167259.001.png 905167259.002.png 905167259.003.png 905167259.004.png 905167259.005.png 905167259.006.png 905167259.007.png
 
INTERVIEW
Beth
Co per
NASA Glenn Research
Internal Agency Hearing
Conservation Consultant
How did you get into
engineering and when did
you start?
I became involved in engineering
through acoustics—the science of
sound. When I was a child, I guess
you could say that I had some
musical talent. I was able to pick out
melodies on the piano at a young
age, and I taught myself to play
several musical instruments. As I
got older, I would write harmonies
for tunes that I learned in school
or camp. This interest propelled
me into an involvement in music,
and that was how I spent most of
my time in high school. The focus
of many school projects was the
science of music — studying how
it was produced and why people
perceived music the way they did.
I was especially interested in the
relationships between sounds,
which is one aspect of the discipline
of music theory.
tones, and those kinds of things. The
technical field that encompasses
all of that is “acoustics.” So, to find
a college, I did what, today, would
be an Internet search—I went to
the library—and found that there
were four schools in the country that
offered undergraduate programs
in acoustics, one of them being the
University of Hartford. The program
there was a Bachelor of Science in
Engineering (B.S.E.) program in
Acoustics and Music. Students in
this program took most of the same
coursework as a music performance
major at the conservatory, Hartt
College of Music, as well as the
core coursework of an engineering
major. It sounded like the perfect
program for me, so that’s what I did.
For the first two years of my college
education I was a double major in
music and acoustics.
above what was required for my
B.S.M.E. degree, so I also earned
the equivalent of a B.S.E. in Music
and Acoustics.
From there I went on to Penn
State because it had the most
acclaimed program in the country
that awarded graduate degrees in
acoustics. The program was very
broad: it covered everything from
underwater acoustics to speech
science and audiology. I had
hoped to study musical acoustics,
but I needed to focus on an area
where there was ample funding
for assistantships. I modified my
academic approach to emphasize
speech science and speech
processing, which was probably
about as close as I could get to
musical acoustics. The connection
is really human perception, which
links speech and hearing sciences
to musical acoustics. So it’s not hard
to imagine the link between that and
being a hearing conservationist,
which is what I am now.
I eventually switched my major
to mechanical engineering, only
because the B.S.E. program at
that time was not accredited, and
I didn’t want to have any concerns
about the validity of my degree
while job hunting later. But I still
took all the same courses over and
When I started to apply to colleges I
very nearly became a music theory
major. It wasn’t until the very last
minute that I realized that there was
a name for what I really liked, which
was the physics of music—intervals,
Where did you irst go to work
after you graduated?
I worked in private industry for about
4
EE Web | Electrical Engineering Community
Visit www.eeweb.com
905167259.008.png 905167259.009.png 905167259.010.png 905167259.011.png 905167259.012.png 905167259.013.png 905167259.014.png 905167259.015.png 905167259.016.png
 
INTERVIEW
four years, but it wasn’t what I really
wanted to do, since my ambition was
always to work for the government
in a research capacity. It took a
while to get an acoustics position at
NASA, but as soon as I heard there
was an opening at Glenn Research
Center in Cleveland, that’s where I
went. I’ve worked here for nearly my
entire professional career—about
25 years.
pretty significant community noise
issue that was threatening the
success of the research program,
and so my boss said, “We know that
human perception of sound is one
of your interests, so will you take a
look at what we can do to solve this
problem?” One thing led to another,
the noise from reverberating inside
the dome; this allows the space
to be used for noise emission
measurements on various aircraft
components.
After leading the acoustical design
and managing the construction
of this facility, I realized that I
didn’t want to go back to being a
researcher. I really enjoyed facility
design and noise control, and I
had, at that point, developed a bit
of a reputation as a “noise control
person,” leading me to take on
other smaller noise control-related
tasks. Eventually, I knew I wanted to
continue working on noise control
projects, which inspired me to find
my next home in the Health and
Safety organization.
Over the span of my
career, I have come
to be acknowledged
as NASA’s “noise
person,” and now
my responsibility is
to advise our senior
environmental
health officer and the
occupational health
personnel at our field
centers about noise
exposure issues,
particularly related
to noise control and
hearing conservation
program policies.
Can you tell us about what
you do at NASA?
Since I’ve been at NASA I’ve had
four major assignments, each
lasting from about five to seven
years. My first assignment was
on a team doing research on the
noise produced by jet nozzles
from aircraft exhaust engines. The
program included both analytical
and experimental research; the
work I was doing specifically
involved testing scale models of
exhaust nozzles in wind tunnels and
other laboratories.
During my interview for that
position, the person interviewing
me—who would eventually become
my boss—said, “We would love to
have you work on noise control,
but it’s really just one element of
a hearing conservation program
and needs to be approached that
way. Would you like to manage the
hearing conservation program?”
So I did that from about 1994 to
1999, establishing the hearing
conservation program here at NASA
Glenn Research Center. It ended up
being a very high-quality program,
and I think that is partly because
there was a significant emphasis
on noise control, which typically
gets neglected in the context of
a classical program. As part of
that assignment, I implemented
an aggressive campaign of noise
control solutions for our test facilities
and infrastructure buildings. I
also developed a number of novel
programs that NASA has since
As a typical researcher in a wind
tunnel, you have a fairly cyclic work
routine. You take data, analyze the
data, then write a paper and go to
a conference to present your work.
But because I had a slightly different
interest area than most of the other
people in my group, I was asked if
I would take a look at a community
noise problem that had developed
with one of our test facilities, where
researchers were doing aircraft
engine component testing in an
open parking lot. Obviously, it was
generating a lot of noise, and since
the testing was being done during
third shift to save money on power,
some residents of the nearby
communities had begun to regularly
call and complain. It had become a
and we ended up building a
geodesic-dome-shaped enclosure
that severely reduced the noise that
could be heard in the surrounding
community. The facility also has an
anechoic interior lining that keeps
5
EE Web | Electrical Engineering Community
Visit www.eeweb.com
905167259.017.png 905167259.018.png 905167259.019.png 905167259.020.png 905167259.021.png 905167259.022.png 905167259.023.png 905167259.024.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin