drozdzeCandida liofilizacja dodatki.pdf

(260 KB) Pobierz
PII: S0168-1605(00)00513-4
International Journal of Food Microbiology 65 2001 173–182
Ž
.
www.elsevier.nlrlocaterijfoodmicro
Effect of freeze drying and protectants on viability of the
biocontrol yeast Candida sake
´ ˜
Posthar Õ est Unit, CeRTA Centre UdL-IRTA, 177 Ro Õ ira Roure A Õ enue, 25198, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
M. Abadias ) , A. Benabarre, N. Teixido, J. Usall, I. Vinas
Received 10 June 2000; received in revised form 29 September 2000; accepted 29 November 2000
Abstract
freeze drying using 10% skim milk as a protectant 28.9% survival . Liquid nitrogen freezing caused the highest level of
damage to the cells with viability -10%. Different concentrations of exogenous substances including sugars, polyols,
polymers and nitrogen compounds were tested either alone or in combination with skim milk. There was little or no effect
when additives were used at 1% concentration. Galactose, raffinose and sodium glutamate at 10% were the best protective
agents tested alone but the viability of freeze-dried C. sake cells was always -20%. Survival of yeast cells was increased
from 0.2% to 30–40% by using appropriate protective media containing combinations of skim milk and other protectants
such as 5% or 10% lactose or glucose, and 10% fructose or sucrose. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
.
Keywords: Viability; Survival; Preservation; Protectants; Formulation; Freeze drying
1. Introduction
pathogens of apples and pears Teixido et al., 1998;
Ž
´
˜ To be of practical use, microbial agents must be
formulated as products capable of storage, distribu-
tion and application in the agricultural marketplace,
requiring different approaches from traditional agro-
Ž
.
Biological control using microbial antagonists has
attracted much interest as an alternative to chemical
methods of controlling pre- and post-harvest plant
pathogens and pests of agricultural and horticultural
Ž
chemical product design Rodham et al., 1999 . For-
mulation is necessary in order to present the product
in a usable form and in order to optimize the effi-
cacy, stability, safety and ease of application of the
Ž
.
1989; Wilson and Wisniewski, 1989 . Recent studies
Ž
have shown that a strain of Candida sake K. Saito
.
and M. Ota N. van Uden and H.R. Buckley CPA-1
is an effective antagonist to the major fungal
Ž
.
product Rhodes, 1993 .
Freeze drying is the most convenient and success-
ful method of preserving bacteria, yeasts and spo-
Ž
.
rulating fungi Berny and Hennebert, 1991 . The
advantages of freeze drying are protection from con-
tamination or infestation during storage, long viabil-
Ž
.
) Corresponding author. Tel.: q34-973-702-647; fax: q34-973-
238-301.
E-mail address: isabel.abadias@irta.es M. Abadias .
Ž
.
ity and ease of strain distribution Smith and Onions,
0168-1605r01r$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Ž .
The effects of freezing method, freeze drying process, and the use of protective agents on the viability of the biocontrol
yeast Candida sake were studied. Freezing at y208C was the best method to preserve the viability of C. sake cells after
Ž
Vinas et al., 1998; Usall et al., 2000 .
crops Janisiewicz, 1988, 1990; Wilson and Chalutz,
.
PII: S 0168-1605 00 00513-4
377961723.005.png 377961723.006.png 377961723.007.png
174
M. Abadias et al. r International Journal of Food Microbiology 65 2001 173–182
(
)
1983 . However, not all strains survive the process
and, among those surviving, quantitative viability
Ž
.
2. Materials and methods
rates as low as 0.1% have been reported Atkin et
al., 1949; Kirsop, 1955; Smith and Onions, 1983;
.
2.1. Yeast
Berny and Hennebert, 1991 . Substances such as
polymers, sugars, albumin, milk, honey, polyols and
amino acids have been tested for their protective
Ž
The yeast used in this study was the strain CPA-1
Ž
of C. sake obtained from UdL-IRTA Catalonia,
.
Spain . It is deposited in Coleccion Espanola de
´
˜
effect during freeze drying e.g., Pedersen, 1965;
Meryman et al., 1977; Womersley, 1981; Font de
.
Cultivos Tipo, CECT-10817 Universidad de Valen-
.
Ž
Valdez et al., 1983a . Skim milk has been used alone
Ž
cia, Campus de Burjasot, Burjasot, Valencia, Spain .
Heckly, 1961 or with other compounds Butterfield
et al., 1974; Smith and Onions, 1983; Berny and
.
.
Ž
2.2. Cultures
Hennebert, 1991 . Components of the suspending
media have two main functions in preserving viabil-
ity of freeze-dried cells. The first is to provide a dry
residue with a definite physical structure acting as a
support material and as a receptor in rehydration, and
the second is to protect the living cells biochemically
Ž
Stock cultures were stored at 48C and had been
Ž
subcultured on nutrient yeast dextrose agar NYDA ,
y1
.
which contained nutrient broth, 8 g l
Ž
Biokar
Diagnostics, BK003, Beauvois, France ; yeast ex-
y1
.
tract, 5 g l , Biokar Diagnostics, 112002 ; dex-
y1
Ž
.
trose, 10 g l , Rectapur, 24 379.294, Prolabo,
.
Ž
against damage during freezing andror drying Berny
.
Fontenay SrBois, France and agar, 15 g l
Ž
y1
and Hennebert, 1991 . These workers found that by
using skim milk as a support material in combination
with two compounds from honey, sodium glutamate,
trehalose or raffinose, the viability of Saccha -
romyces cere Õ isiae cells was increased from 30% to
96–98%.
The cooling rate of the cells during the cooling
phase is a critical factor in the freeze drying process.
The optimum cooling rate appears to be that at
which the cells do not lose water and reaches the
Ž
NOKO, RG-99112318, Asturias, Spain .
.
2.3. Cell production
broth NYDB , which was NYDA without agar.
Ž
.
Cultures were grown in a 5-l fermentor Gallenkamp,
.
Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK containing 4 l of
medium at 25"18C with constant stirring and aera-
tion for 38 h. Cells were harvested at the beginning
of the stationary phase by centrifugation at 8315= g
for 10 min at 108C in an Avantie J-25 centrifuge
Ž
eutectic frozen point in an amorphous state Berny
.
and Hennebert, 1991 . If cooling is slow enough,
water will have time to flow out of the cell by
osmosis dehydrating the cell and thus avoiding freez-
ing. If the cells do not lose water quickly enough to
maintain equilibrium, ice crystals eventually form
Ž
Beckman; Palo Alto, CA . The growth medium was
decanted and the cell paste resuspended in 10–15 ml
Ž
.
of potassium phosphate buffer PB, 70 ml 0.2 M
Ž
intracellularly Mazur, 1977 .
Few studies have been carried out to evaluate the
efficacy of such treatments for conserving viability
of cells of postharvest biological control agents such
as C. sake . This is critical since a high cell concen-
tration is necessary in order to obtain a good formu-
lated product for commercial application. Thus, the
objectives of this study were to compare the effi-
ciency of different freezing methods, and compare
the additions of a range of individual additives and
combinations with powdered skimmed milk as pro-
tectants for preserving the viability of C. sake cells
during freeze drying.
.
KH PO Rectapur, 26 923.298, Prolabo q30 ml
2
.
0.2 M K HPO Rectapur, 26 930.293, Prolabo , pH
2 4
6.5, and centrifuged again. The resulting cell paste
was stored at 48C and used the same day. Usually,
about 15 g of cell paste with a moisture content of
Ž
Ž
.
about 75% wrw were obtained per liter of NYDB
medium.
.
2.4. Freezing treatments
C. sake cells were produced as described above
and the cell paste was then resuspended in powdered
Ž w
´
The growth medium was nutrient yeast dextrose
Ž
4
skimmed non-fat milk SM, Sveltesse , Nestle Es-
M. Abadias et al. r International Journal of Food Microbiology 65 2001 173–182
(
)
175
˜
used as a control. Ten-fold dilutions of this suspen-
sion were made and spread plated in duplicate onto
the surface of 9-cm Petri plates in order to calculate
the initial concentration. Plates were incubated at
25"18C for 48 h and the initial number of colony
Ž
.
Ž
.
in three autoclaved vials and were frozen at y208C
overnight. Then samples were connected to the
freeze-drier for 24 h. Each sample of freeze-dried C.
sake cells was rehydrated and plated as described
above. The percentage of survival was determined
from the viable yeast counts made before and after
freeze drying.
forming units per mililiter CFU ml
y1 .
was calcu-
lated.
Thereafter, 5-ml samples were distributed in 24
Ž
Suspensions of sugars glucose, fructose, galac-
.
Ž
tose, trehalose, lactose, sucrose and raffinose ; poly-
Ž
autoclaved vials 10 ml, Serum Type Reaction Vial,
.
ols glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, inositol and ado-
.
Supelco, Bellefonte, PA in order to evaluate the
effect of four different freezing methods on C. sake
viability. The first and second methods consisted of
freezing directly at y128C and y208C, respectively,
and maintaining the samples at these temperatures
overnight. Progressive freezing consisted of refriger-
ating samples at 48C for 2 h, then freezing at y128C
for 8 h, and maintaining the samples at y208C
overnight. Liquid nitrogen freezing consisted in sub-
Ž.
nitol ; polymers dextran, starch and polyethylene
Ž
Ž
glycol 200 PEG ; peptone and sodium glutamate
were made with de-ionized water. Concentrations of
Ž
..
1%, 5% and 10% wrv were prepared. Moreover, a
10% suspension of SM was studied in order to
compare with the other treatments.
Solutions were autoclaved at 1158C for 15 min,
except adonitol, which was sterilised by filtration
Ž
.
using a 0.20-mm diameter filter GS Type, Millipore,
.
merging the samples in liquid nitrogen N and then
2
maintaining the cells at y208C overnight. There-
after, three of the six samples of each treatment were
thawed at room temperature and viability was calcu-
lated by the standard plate count method as de-
scribed above in order to evaluate the effect of
freezing on C. sake cell viability. The other three
Ž
Ireland .
Ž.
D q -Sucrose, anhydrous D q -glucose, starch
Ž
Ž.
and glycerol 98% were provided by Rectapur Pro-
.Ž. Ž.
labo ; D q -galactose, D q -raffinose pentahydrate,
Ž.
D -mannitol, D q -trehalose dihydrate, dextran,
Ž
meso-inositol and adonitol by Sigma-Aldrich, Stein-
. Ž .
heim, Germany ; D y -fructose, lactose-1-hydrate,
Ž.
vials were connected to a freeze-drier Cryodos,
.
PEG200, D y -sorbitol and sodium L -glutamate-1-
Ž
Telstar, Terrassa, Spain operating at 1 Pa and y458C
for 24 h. Each sample of freeze-dried C. sake was
Ž
hydrate by Panreac Quımica, Montcada i Reixac,
´
Barcelona, Spain .
Glucose, fructose, galactose, trehalose, sucrose,
lactose, raffinose, glutamate, dextran, starch, sorbitol
.
rehydrated to its original volume 5 ml with PB for
10 min at room temperature, and then CFU ml y1
was determined as described above. The survival
level was determined for frozen, and freeze-dried
cell treatments, and quantitative comparisons made
Ž
.
CFU ml before and after freezing and freeze
drying, respectively. The experiments were all re-
peated twice.
.
Table 1
Viability of C. sake cells after freezing and freeze drying with
different methods using 10% of skim milk as a protective agent
Ž.
Viability %
After freezing
2.5. Effect of protecti Õ e agents
After freeze drying
Freeze
Mean
Standard
Mean
Standard
Cell paste obtained by centrifugation as described
above was resuspended in the protective medium to
make a total volume of 10% of the initial one,
containing approximately 1.0=10 9 to 5.0=10 9
CFU ml y1 . The initial cell concentration of each
protective suspension was calculated by the standard
Ž
method
deviation
deviation
y128C
89.7
a
3.4
19.3
b
4.1
y208C
85.1
a
5.3
28.9
a
1.1
Progressive
71.3
b
1.1
20.7
b
1.9
Liquid nitrogen
52.1
c
4.5
9.2
c
2.1
plate count method. Aliquots 5 ml were distributed
.
Means with different letters within columns are significantly
Ž
.
pana, Barcelona, Spain at 10% wrv which was
y1
different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test P -0.05 .
377961723.008.png
176
M. Abadias et al. r International Journal of Food Microbiology 65 2001 173–182
(
)
and adonitol were combined at 5 and 10% wrv
Ž
Ž
.
3. Results
with SM at 5 and 10% wrv concentration.
.
3.1. Comparison of freezing treatments
2.6. Data analysis
The resulting colonies from samples taken before
and after freeze drying were counted and the per-
centages of surviving C. sake were also estimated.
Percentages of viability were analysed by a General
Ž
y128C and y208C, with survival )85% Table 1 .
After freeze drying, the viability of the yeast cells
was drastically decreased to -30% in all cases,
with the best results obtained at the y208C freezing
treatment. The viability of the cells after freezing,
and freeze drying when the cells were frozen with N 2
Ž
.
Lineal Model GLM procedure with SAS software
Ž
.
SAS Institute, version 6.12, Cary, NC, USA . Statis-
tical significance was judged at the level P s0.05.
When the analysis was statistically significant, Dun-
can’s Multiple Range Test was used for separation of
means.
.
was significantly lower P -0.05 than that obtained
with the other freezing methods. Consequently, this
method was rejected and freezing at y208C was
.
Table 2
Viability of C. sake % after freeze drying using different concentrations of protective agents dissolved in deionized water
Concentration, % wrv
1%
Ž.
5%
10%
Protectant
Mean
Standard
Mean
Standard
Mean
Standard
deviation
deviation
deviation
Monossaccharides
Glucose
0.2
def
0.0
2.8
de
0.3
8.6
de
1.2
Fructose
0.2
def
0.1
4.3
cd
0.4
5.9
ef
0.7
Galactose
1.0
bc
0.3
6.4
b
1.0
16.6
ab
6.5
Dissaccharides
Sucrose
0.7
cdef
0.2
6.2
b
0.7
11.4
cd
1.4
Lactose
0.8
cde
0.2
5.9
bc
0.6
12.2
cd
2.7
Trehalose
1.5
ab
0.0
6.1
bc
1.8
12.5
cd
1.4
Tri-saccharides
Raffinose
1.7
a
0.5
13.2
a
1.6
19.1
a
3.6
Polymers
Dextran
1.7
a
0.9
3.4
d
0.8
3.7
fg
1.5
Starch
2.1
a
0.5
7.0
b
3.0
11.9
cd
2.0
PEG
-0.1
f
0.2
f
0.1
0.2
g
0.1
Polyols
Glycerol
0.3
cdef
0.1
0.1
f
0.1
0.3
g
0.4
Mannitol
0.1
ef
0.1
1.0
ef
0.3
6.4
ef
1.0
Sorbitol
0.6
cdef
0.1
2.6
de
0.4
13.0
bc
1.7
Adonitol
0.8
cd
0.6
1.5
ef
0.2
8.6
de
0.7
Inositol
0.6
cdef
0.5
-0.1
f
-0.1
g
Nitrogen compounds
Glutamate
0.6
cdef
0.2
5.4
bc
0.4
19.8
a
1.3
Peptone
-0.1
f
-0.1
f
-0.1
g
Different letters within the same column indicate that means are significantly different P -0.05 according to a Duncan’s Multiple Range
Test.
Ž
.
The highest viability of C. sake cells after freez-
ing was obtained when samples were frozen at
Ž
377961723.001.png 377961723.002.png 377961723.003.png
M. Abadias et al. r International Journal of Food Microbiology 65 2001 173–182
(
)
177
chosen as the best treatment with which to carry out
further experimentation.
additives were all ineffective in conserving viability.
At 5%, the best protective agent was raffinose, with
13.2% of cells remaining viable. Best viabilities
were observed with 10% glutamate, raffinose and
galactose, with 19.8%, 19.1% and 16.6% survival,
respectively.
Among the sugars, the trisaccharide raffinose was
found to be the best protectant giving cell viabilities
of 13.2% and 19.1% at concentrations of 5% and
10%, respectively. No significant differences were
Ž
3.2. Effect of protecti Õ e agents
The additives tested as protective agents against
freeze drying in this study may be divided in four
groups: sugars, polyols, polymers and nitrogen com-
pounds. In this experiment all additives were tested
using deionized water as a suspending medium. Af-
ter freeze drying, cell viability in the absence of the
protective agents was very low, 0.2% and 0.3% for
Ž
observed P )0.05 between the dissacharides su-
crose, lactose and trehalose at both of the higher
concentrations tested. Galactose was the best
monosaccharide treatment tested and showed statisti-
cally higher survival of C. sake cells than glucose
and fructose. At 10% concentration, raffinose and
galactose showed the best protective effect, signifi-
cantly different from the other sugars.
The protective effect of polyols was in general
Ž
.
deionized water and PB, respectively data not
.
shown . The viability of C. sake cells freeze dried in
Ž
10% SM was 22% data not shown . Results with the
additives are shown in Table 2.
An increase in viability was observed when the
concentration of the protective agent was increased
from 1% to 10%, except for dextran, glycerol, inosi-
tol, PEG and peptone. At 1% concentration, the
.
lower than that obtained with sugars. Sorbitol 10%
.
Fig. 1. Viability of C. sake cells after freeze drying using combinations of: A glucose, B fructose, C trehalose and D sucrose at 0%
Ž. Ž . Ž.
Ž. Ž. Ž.
Ž.
I , 5% or 10% B with SM. Within the same figure, different letters indicate significant differences P -0.05 according to
Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Ž
.
377961723.004.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin