TECH TALK.pdf

TECH TALK

IN THE FIGHT TO EXPOSE AND

STOP THE CRIME OF

ORGANIZED STALKING AND

ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT

Eleanor White

WORK IN PROGRESS - frequent updates, check the page number/date/time

stamp to see if you have the latest version.

** NOT COPYRIGHTED **

Page 1 (Jul 30, 2009 12:44)

LIST OF SECTIONS

Page numbers are not given here, as this booklet will be updated frequently when new

information becomes available.

1. Purpose of This Booklet

1a. Is It a Relevant Weapon, or Not?

2. Attacked by a “Signal,” not a “Frequency”

3. Fields

4. “Electric/Electrostatic,” “Magnetic,” and “Electromagnetic” Fields

5. Sound Versus Electromagnetic (or Electric or Magnetic) Fields/Signals

6. The Frequency Spectrum

7. Resonant Frequency

8. HAARP

9. Grounding

10. Power Level

11. Does Sound Cause Remote Physical Manipulation?

12. Light vs. Microwave, Resolution

13. Satellite Capabilities

14. LRAD, HyperSonic Sound, and the Acoustic Spotlight

15. The Neurophone

A1. Glossary

A2. Proven-to-Exist E-weapon Technologies

Page 2 (Jul 30, 2009 12:44)

1. Purpose of This Booklet

This booklet is not a technology course. It is a collection of highlights of technology

information and jargon to assist targets of organized stalking and electronic harassment (OS/

EH) who do not have technology education and experience.

Most people can handle technology concepts well in conversation, even if their jargon is a

little off, in most situations. But the OS/EH situation is quite different from “most situations.”

Half of our attacks are in the form of silent, through-wall technology capable of singling out

just one person, even in crowds. We are always fighting for credibility, and there are always

skeptics and contrarians who will take advantage of a slip up in tech speak.

To targets who have technology backgrounds: I have intentionally avoided flooding the

reader with the full story about the technology concepts presented here. You may find things

you consider “needing more detail” or “not quite right.” Please keep in mind that this

collection of information is for non-technology-educated people, and the goal is to give just

enough insight that non-technology-educated targets can improve their grasp of technology

concepts. Improvement, not a thorough education, is the purpose of this booklet.

Another e-booklet which outlines the proven-to-exist and not classified secret and available to

the public for up to half a century and create-some-of-the-effects-we-experience electronic

weapons is at:

http://www.multistalkervictims.org/osatv.pdf (Electronic Weapons chapter)

The above booklet is specifically designed to be given to the general publc. The electronic

weapons chapter is also appended here at the end of this booklet.

More detail on those weapons can be found here:

http://www.raven1.net/proventechs.pdf

1a. Is It a Relevant Weapon, or Not?

Here is a list of criteria for determining if a given technology can be credibly used in

describing electronic harassment attacks:

• it reproduces EXACTLY at least one of the attack effects we commonly experience

• it does so SILENTLY

• it does so THROUGH WALLS without disturbing the walls in any way

• it does so at NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOUR distances

• it does so withOUT alerting/affecting neighbours

• it has been DEMONSTRATED, NOT just forecast, and the details of the demo are

documented in a mainstream ORGANIZATION's publication under their name or logo

(individual assertions do not work in forcing reluctant, fearful or corrupt officials to

accept reality, even if the individual is eminently qualified)

Page 3 (Jul 30, 2009 12:44)

Electronic weapons which do not meet those criteria can be helpful, by opening the eyes of

the public that there really are such things as electronic weapons. But helpful or not,

technologies which do not meet those criteria should not be claimed as being in use against

organized stalking and electronic harassment (OS/EH) targets.

2. Attacked by a “Signal,” not a “Frequency”

Best to say “attacked by a SIGNAL.”

In speaking and writing to non-targets, we have the substantial disadvantage that at this time

in history, the general public is unaware of OS/EH operations. That means that problems with

jargon which are insignificant in, say, talking about gardening, can make us less believable.

The title of this section illustrates a common tech talk problem. Targets will sometimes say

they are being attacked “by a frequency,” or by “frequency weapons.” While this isn't fatal, it

could be improved.

The technically proper name for “something” which emanates from a source and travels to an

object, where the “something” causes an effect is SIGNAL. When you are talking to people

with technology backgrounds, SIGNAL is the best term to use.

Electromagnetic and acoustic SIGNALS have different “properties.” One such property is the

FREQUENCY of the signal. FREQUENCY is just a property or attribute, it's not the “stuff”

which enters your body and causes discomfort.

3. Fields

Most people understand magnetic fields, and static electricity fields. A FIELD can be static,

not changing (like “static electricity”), or can be time varying, such as the way current flowing

in your home power wiring can affect things nearby. A FIELD can have FREQUENCY as

one of its properties.

A FIELD fills an AREA.

It is equally OK to refer to “detecting a FIELD,” or “detecting a SIGNAL.” To say “detecting a

FREQUENCY” is a bit confusing because it could mean a property of an EM signal, or sound.

4. “Electric/Electrostatic,” “Magnetic,” and “Electromagnetic” Fields

ELECTRIC or ELECTROSTATIC fields happen when two objects have different voltage levels

applied to them, for example, two live wires, or you and a metal object in dry weather where

you have picked up “static electricity.”

MAGNETIC fields exist around magnets, and magnets can be wires carrying current, either

steady current or alternating current as in your house wiring. (Coiling a wire can increase the

strength of the magnetic field in the area.)

Page 4 (Jul 30, 2009 12:44)

Signals which include radio, microwave, infrared, light, ultraviolet, xrays, and gamma rays, are

ELECTROMAGNETIC, and can also all be referred to as radiation.

• Of the three field types named in this section, ELECTROMAGNETIC fields can be

created by a signal at huge distances. Electric/electrostatic and magnetic fields, in

practical terms, are not long distance things.

• You know how table salt is a chemical compound of sodium and chlorine? Salt is not

at all like either pure sodium or pure chlorine.

ELECTROMAGNETIC fields or signals or radiation are likewise different from both

electric/electrostatic or magnetic fields, like a chemical compound.

• ELECTRIC and MAGNETIC fields can be either steady (“static”) or vary with time.

However, ELECTROMAGNETIC (EM) fields are unique, in that they are only produced

when an electric current is changing with time. “Oscillation” is required.

In a practical sense, being harassed by either electric/electrostatic or magnetic fields would

require that something capable of setting up such fields be physically close to the target.

A Tri-Field meter ( http://www.trifield.com ) has a selector switch and can check for all three

types of fields.

ELECTROMAGNETIC fields or signals or radiation come in two varieties, depending on

frequency of oscillation:

• Non-ionizing, from zero Hertz up through ultraviolet light

• Ionizing, above ultraviolet light

When the frequency of oscillation of an EM signal gets high enough, that radiation is

energetic enough to knock some electrons out of their orbits around atoms or molecules. An

atom or molecule which is missing or has an extra electron is an “ion.” That signal is in the

“ionizing” frequency range.

When considering experiments with test equipment, you need to know whether you are

looking to test for non-ionizing or ionizing radiation as the testers are quite different.

To date, most of the bodily effects which can be caused by EM radiation are documented in

the non-ionizing lower frequency ranges.

5. Sound Versus Electromagnetic (or Electric or Magnetic) Fields/Signals

Sound is totally different from electromagnetic or electric or magnetic fields/signals.

Page 5 (Jul 30, 2009 12:44)

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: