Eutrophication Management and Ecotoxicology - M. Scholten, et al., (Springer, 2005) WW.pdf

(4143 KB) Pobierz
663460982 UNPDF
Environmental Science
Series Editors: R Allan
U. Förstner
W. Salomons
M.C. Th. Scholten, E.M. Foekema,
H.P. Van Dokkum, N.H.B.M. Kaag and
R.G. Jak
Eutrophication
Management
and Ecotoxicology
With 75 Figures
663460982.001.png
M ARTIN C.T H . S CHOLTEN
E DWIN M. F OEKEMA
H ENNO P. V AN D OKKUM
N ICOLAAS H.B.M. K AAG
R OBBERT G. J AK
TNO-MEP
P.O. B OX 57
1780 AB, D EN H ELDER
T HE N ETHERLANDS
E- MAIL :
H. VAN D OKKUM @ MEP . TNO . NL
ISSN 1431-6250
ISBN 3-540-22210-3 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
Library of Congress Control Number: 2004114232
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is
concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broad-
casting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of
this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law
of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from
Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law.
Springer is a part of Springer Science+Business Media
springeronline.com
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005
Printed in Germany
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not
imply, even in the absence of
a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations
and therefore free for general use.
Cover design: E. Kirchner, Heidelberg
Production: A. Oelschläger
Typesetting: Camera-ready by PTP-Berlin
Printing: Mercedes-Druck, Berlin
Binding: Stein + Lehmann, Berlin
Printed on acid-free paper 30/2132/AO 5 4 3 2 1 0
Table of Contents
1 Eutrophication and the Ecosystem .......................................................1
1.1 Background.......................................................................................1
1.2 Eutrophic and Eutrophicated Waters................................................2
1.3 Trophic Cascades in Freshwaters ....................................................5
1.4 Eutrophicated Waters: Disturbed Trophic Cascades .....................13
2 Daphnid Grazing Ecology .....................................................................21
2.1 Daphnids and Their Ecological Role...............................................21
2.2 Daphnid Grazing Effectiveness –
Concept and Measurement ............................................................38
2.3 Modelling Daphnid Grazing Effectiveness......................................49
3 Toxic Reduction of Daphnid Grazing Effectiveness ..........................57
3.1 Daphnid Ecotoxicology ...................................................................57
3.2 Observations from Mesocosm Studies ..........................................62
3.3 Daphnid Grazing Effectiveness in Response
to Toxicant Exposure ......................................................................72
4 Field Observations of Daphnid Grazing ..............................................81
4.1 Two Different Lakes in Holland .......................................................81
4.2 The Plankton Dynamics in Lake Geestmerambacht ......................82
4.3 The Plankton Dynamics in Lake Amstelmeer .................................89
4.4 What Can Be Learned from These Lakes?.....................................91
5 New Perspectives for Eutrophication Management..........................97
5.1 A New Dimension in Lake Eutrophication Management ................97
5.2 How to Address Ecotoxicology
in Eutrophication Management.....................................................102
5.3 Epilogue ........................................................................................108
Acknowledgements ...............................................................................111
References ..............................................................................................113
1 Eutrophication and the Ecosystem
1.1 Background
Eutrophication of surface waters is generally recognised as a matter for environ-
mental concern. Eutrophication is characterised by increased algal growth, with an
increased incidence of toxic cyanobacteria blooms and a decrease in the abun-
dance of species.
Some of the manifest problems brought about by prolific algal biomass include:
turbid waters; anoxic conditions; bad smell and chironomid and Culex midge
plagues (Vollenweider 1990; Moss et al. 1996a; Carpenter et al. 1998). Such eu-
trophication problems (“eutrophication” sensu lato ) are generally considered to be
the consequence of enhanced nutrient loadings (“eutrophication” sensu stricto )
(Likens 1972; Vollenweider 1990; Reynolds 1992; Moss et al. 1996a; Carpenter et
al. 1998). Therefore, the management of eutrophicated water bodies is usually
primarily focused on the reduction of nutrient loading, supported by a policy of
reduced environmental releases of phosphorus from laundry detergents, sewage
and agriculture.
However, it became apparent over the past decade, that reduced grazing of al-
gae by daphnids can be a crucial factor determining whether or not nutrient en-
richment will lead to eutrophication problems (Moss et al. 1991; Moss et al.
1996b; Reynolds 1994). Biomanipulation of eutrophicated shallow water bodies,
thereby improving ecological conditions for daphnids, became a regular tool ap-
plied in eutrophication management practice (Benndorf 1990; McQueen 1998;
Harper et al. 1999).
Biomanipulation is mainly focussed on the improvement of biological condi-
tions leading to a higher survival rate for daphnids as part of the aquatic foodweb.
Examples of biomanipulation measures include: reduction of predation by plank-
tivorous fish and improvement to the submerged vegetation as a shelter for daph-
nids against predation. More recently, the palatability of suspended particles as a
factor determining the grazing efficiency of daphnids has become a topic of inter-
est. High concentrations of resuspended inorganic particles hamper daphnid graz-
ing, while at the same time stimulating algal growth due to increased nutrient re-
leases (Kirk and Gilbert 1990; Ogilvie and Mitchell 1998). Top-down control by
daphnids under eutrophicated conditions may also be reduced by the presence of
unpalatable algal species (mainly cyanobacteria) that may gain competitive advan-
tage over the heavily grazed palatable algal species.
This book covers another important aspect regarding the improvement of envi-
ronmental conditions for daphnids, which is necessary for successful eutrophica-
tion management, i.e. optimalisation of the abiotic water conditions. Bales et al.
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin