BW-ch11.pdf

(578 KB) Pobierz
451105980 UNPDF
Smallpox and Related Orthopoxviruses
Chapter 11
SMALLPOX AND RELATED
ORTHOPOXVIRUSES
PETER B. JAHRLING, P h D * ; JOHN W. HUGGINS, P h D ; M. SOFI IBRAHIM, MS c , P h D ; JAMES V. LAWLER, MD § ; a n d
JAMES W. MARTIN, MD, FACP ¥
INTRODUCTION
AGENT CHARACTERISTICS
Classification
Morphology
Phylogenetic Relationships
Replication
Pathogenesis
ORTHOPOXVIRUSES AS BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AND BIOTERRORISM
THREATS
CLINICAL ASPECTS OF ORTHOPOXVIRUS INFECTIONS
Smallpox
Monkeypox
Other Orthopoxviruses Infecting Humans
DIAGNOSIS
Clinical Diagnosis
Laboratory Diagnosis
Phenotypic Diagnosis
Immunodiagnosis
Nucleic Acid Diagnosis
MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
Prophylaxis
Treatment
SUMMARY
* Director, National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility, National Institutes of Health, 6700A Rockledge Drive,
Bethesda, Maryland 20897; formerly, Senior Research Scientist, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort
Detrick, Maryland
Chief, Viral Therapeutics Branch, US Army Medical Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702
Lieutenant Colonel, Medical Service Corps, US Army Reserve; Microbiologist, Division of Virology, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious
Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702
§ Lieutenant Commander, Medical Corps, US Navy Reserve; Director for Biodefense Policy, Homeland Security Council, The White House, Washington,
DC 20502; formerly, Infectious Diseases Physician, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick,
Maryland
¥ Colonel, Medical Corps, US Army; Chief, Operational Medicine Department, Division of Medicine, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious
Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702
215
 
Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare
INTRODUCTION
Variola, the virus that causes smallpox, is one of
the most significant bioterrorist threat agents. During
the 20th century, smallpox is estimated to have caused
over 500 million human deaths. 1 Yet the disease and
the naturally circulating virus itself were eradicated
by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global
eradication campaign, which was declared a success
in 1980. 2 This program, which involved vaccinating
all humans in a ring surrounding every suspected
case of variola infection, was successful in part be-
cause smallpox is solely a human disease; there are
no animal reservoirs to reintroduce the virus into
the human population. The impact of a smallpox
virus attack in the human population would be even
more catastrophic now than during the 20th century,
because most vaccination programs were abandoned
worldwide in the 1970s, the prevalence of immunosup-
pressed individuals has grown, and mobility, including
intercontinental air travel, has accelerated the pace of
viral spread. Smallpox virus is stable, highly infectious
via the aerosol route, and highly transmissible from
infected to susceptible persons, and it has a relatively
long asymptomatic incubation period, making contact
tracing difficult. 3 Mathematical models of a variola
reintroduction into contemporary human populations
indicate dire consequences. 4 Public health experts have
argued that a significant portion of the population
should be prevaccinated to blunt the impact of such
an attack. 5 However, the vaccine is associated with
significant adverse events, 6 which are more serious in
persons who are immunocompromised, and prerelease
vaccination is contraindicated for a significant portion
of the population.
Recent revelations that the former Soviet Union
produced ton quantities of smallpox virus as a strategic
weapon 3 and conducted open-air testing of aerosolized
variola on Vozrozhdeniye Island in the Aral Sea have in-
creased the plausibility of variola being used as a bioter-
rorism agent. 7 Considerable investment is being made in
biopreparedness measures against smallpox and related
orthopoxviruses, including emergency response plans
for mass immunization and quarantine, 8 as well as de-
velopment of improved countermeasures such as new
vaccines and antiviral drugs. 9 These countermeasures
are also needed to respond to the public health threat
of the closely related monkeypox virus, which occurs
naturally in western and central Africa and produces
a disease in humans that closely resembles smallpox.
Alibek claimed that monkeypox virus was weaponized
by the former Soviet Union. 10 Monkeypox virus was
imported inadvertently into the United States in 2003
via a shipment of rodents originating in Ghana, where,
in contrast to the significant morbidity and mortality
seen in the Democratic Republic of Congo, little mor-
bidity was associated with infection. Over 50 human
infections were documented in the United States as a
result, demonstrating the public health importance of
this agent and the potential bioterrorist threat. 11,12
AGENT CHARACTERISTICS
Classification
Poxviruses infect most vertebrates and invertebrates,
causing a variety of diseases of veterinary and medical
importance. The poxvirus family is divided into two
main subfamilies: (1) the Chordopoxvirinae , which infects
vertebrates; and (2) the Entomopoxvirinae , which infects
insects. Subfamily Chordopoxvirinae is divided into eight
genera, one of which is Orthopoxvirus , which includes
the human pathogens variola (Figure 11-1), monkeypox
virus, and other species that infect humans such as cow-
pox and vaccinia viruses. Members of the Orthopoxvirus
genus are mostly zoonotic pathogens, and a few of these
viruses produce disease in humans (Table 11-1).
Morphology
Orthopoxviruses are oval, brick-shaped particles
with a geometrically corrugated outer surface. Their
size ranges from 220 nm to 450 nm long and 140 nm
Fig. 11-1. A transmission electron micrograph of a tissue
section containing variola viruses.
Photograph: Courtesy of FA Murphy, University of Texas
Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
216
451105980.003.png
Smallpox and Related Orthopoxviruses
TABLE 11-1
POXVIRUSES THAT CAUSE HUMAN DISEASE
Genus
Species
Animal Reservoir
Orthopoxvirus
Variola virus
None
Vaccinia virus
Unknown (none?)
Cowpox virus
Rodents
Monkeypox virus
Rodents
Parapoxvirus
Bovine popular stomatitis virus
Cattle
Orf virus
Sheep
Pseudocowpox virus
Cattle
Seal parapoxvirus
Seals
Parapoxvirus
Tanapox
Rodents (?)
Yabapox virus
Monkeys (?)
Molluscipoxvirus
Molluscum contagiosum virus
None
to 260 nm wide. The outer envelope consists of a lipo-
protein layer embedding surface tubules and enclosing
a core described as biconcave because of an electron
microscopy fixation artifact. The core contains the viral
DNA and core fibrils, and it is surrounded by the core
envelope and a tightly arranged layer of rod-shaped
structures known as the palisade layer. Between the
palisade layer and the outer envelope are two oval
masses known as the lateral bodies (Figure 11-2). Two
infectious forms of orthopoxviruses (described next)
result from the replication cycle.
185,000-kilobase (kb) genome.
As anticipated from the genomic homologies,
members of the Orthopoxvirus genus are antigenically
related. Serum absorption and monoclonal antibody
studies have identified cross-reacting and species-
specific neutralizing antigens. 15 Nine neutralizing
epitopes have been identified among the intracellular
Phylogenetic Relationships
The evolutionary relationships among the poxvi-
ruses have been facilitated by the recent availability
of complete DNA sequences for over 30 species. Phy-
logenetic analysis reveals that variola and camelpox
viruses are more closely related to each other than
any other members of the genus, and vaccinia is most
closely related to cowpox virus strain GRI-90. 13,14
Cowpox virus strain GRI-90 appears to be less closely
related to cowpox virus strain Brighton, indicating that
at least two separate species are included under the
name cowpox virus. Monkeypox virus does not group
closely with any other orthopoxvirus, which indicates
that it diverged from the rest of the genus members
long ago. Yet vaccination prevents monkeypox. Minor
modifications to the camelpox virus genome might
result in a virus with variola attributes. Virulence or
attenuation may hinge on a few genetic determinants.
For example, variola major (associated with a 30%
fatality rate) and variola minor ( < 1% fatality rate)
are greater than 98% identical over the length of the
Fig. 11-2. Thin section of smallpox virus growing in the cy-
toplasm of an infected chick embryo cell of infected person.
Intracellular mature virions (brick-shaped) and immature
virions (spherical) are visible. Magnification is approximately
x 25,000.
Photograph: Courtesy of FA Murphy, University of Texas
Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
217
451105980.004.png 451105980.005.png
Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare
mature virion (IMV) particles of different species of
orthopoxviruses 16 ; additional epitopes, believed to
be critical in protection against infection in vivo, ex-
ist on extracellular enveloped viral particles. 17,18 Viral
envelope proteins are important in protective antibody
responses: envelope antigens were absent from virion
suspensions used for inactivated smallpox vaccines
that proved to be ineffective. 19,20
tion. The central region of the genome contains highly
conserved genes that are essential for viral replication,
and the terminal regions contain less conserved genes
that are important for virus-host interactions. The vi-
rus contains a number of virus-encoded enzymes, in
particular a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase that
transcribes the viral genome. 21 Replication occurs in
cytoplasmic factories referred to as B-type inclusions,
in which virions at various stages of assembly are seen.
Whether host cell nuclear factors are involved in viral
replication or maturation is unclear. Cells infected
with some poxviruses (eg, cowpox, avian poxviruses)
also contain electron-dense A-type inclusions, usually
containing mature virions; A-type inclusions are easily
seen by light microscopy (Figure 11-3).
Replication
Orthopoxvirus genomes are linear, double-stranded
DNA approximately 200 kb long. The genomes encode
about 176 to 266 proteins, including enzymes and fac-
tors that are necessary for self-replication and matura-
a
b
Fig. 11-3. Cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in cells infected with
orthopoxviruses. ( a ) B-type (pale-red, irregular) inclusion, or
Guarnieri, bodies, and A-type (large eosinophilic, with halo)
inclusion bodies in ectodermal cells of the chorioallantoic
membrane, in a pock produced by cowpox virus. A number
of nucleated erythrocytes are in the ectoderm and free in the
mesoderm, and the surface of the pock is ulcerated. Hematoxylin-eosin stain. ( b ) This section of the skin of a patient with
hemorrhagic-type smallpox shows Guarnieri bodies and free erythrocytes below an early vesicle. Hematoxylin-eosin stain.
Reproduced with permission from Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID. Smallpox and Its Eradication . Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1988: 85.
218
451105980.001.png 451105980.002.png
Smallpox and Related Orthopoxviruses
Viral replication begins with attachment of viral
particles to the host cell surface, most likely through
cell receptors, and involves expression of early, in-
termediate, and late genes. 21 Initial uncoating occurs
during entry, followed by synthesis of early mRNAs,
which are translated to facilitate further uncoating and
transcription of intermediate mRNAs. Intermediate
mRNAs, in turn, are translated to allow transcription
of the late mRNAs. The late mRNAs are translated into
structural and nonstructural proteins of the virions.
These proteins, along with DNA concatemers that
are formed during the early phase of replication, are
assembled into genomic DNA and packaged into im-
mature virions, which then evolve into brick-shaped
infectious IMVs. IMVs are infectious only when they
are released by cell lysis. IMV particles, which can
acquire a second membrane from an early endosomal
component to form the intracellular enveloped virion
(IEV), migrate to the cell surface via microtubules and
fuse with the cell membrane to form cell-associated
virions (CEVs). CEVs induce polymerization of actin
to form filaments that affect the direct transfer of CEVs
to adjacent cells. If CEVs become dissociated from the
cell membranes, they are called extracellular envel-
oped virions (EEVs). Although IMVs are produced
in greatest abundance in cell culture and are the most
stable to environmental degradation, CEVs and EEVs
probably play a more critical role in cell-to-cell spread
in the intact animal. 22
Many of the Orthopoxvirus gene products, known as
virokines and viroceptors, interact with and modulate
essential functions of the host cells and immune pro-
cesses. 21,23 The limited host range of variola may relate
to the unique association of viral gene products with
various host signaling pathways. Therefore, strategies
that block such key pathways in the replication and
maturation of poxviruses provide potential targets for
therapeutic intervention. 24
including regional lymphatics, spleen, and tonsils. A
second, brief viremia transports the virus to the skin
and to visceral tissues immediately before the prodro-
mal phase. In humans, the prodrome is characterized
by an abrupt onset of headache, backache, and fever,
and usually sore throat resulting from viral replication
in the oral mucosa. Characteristic skin lesions develop
following viral invasion of the capillary epithelium of
the dermal layer. The virus may also be present in urine
and conjunctival secretions. 30 At death, most visceral
tissues contain massive virus concentrations.
In a review of all pathology reports published in
English over the past 200 years, 31 Martin suggested
that generally healthy patients who died of smallpox
usually died of renal failure, shock secondary to vol-
ume depletion, and difficulty with oxygenation and
ventilation as a result of viral pneumonia and airway
compromise, respectively. Degeneration of hepatocytes
might have caused a degree of compromise, but liver
failure was not usually the proximate cause of death.
Much of the pathogenesis of smallpox remains
a mystery because of the limited tools that were
available when it was an endemic disease. Detailed
analysis of the pathophysiology of the disease course
using the monkeypox and variola primate models and
in comparison with limited clinical and pathology
data from human smallpox victims suggests a role
for dysregulation of the immune response involv-
ing the production of proinflammatory cytokines,
lymphocyte apoptosis, and the development of co-
agulation abnormalities. High viral burdens, which
were identified in numerous target tissues in the
animal models, were probably associated with organ
dysfunction and multisystem failure. Immunohisto-
chemistry studies showing the distribution of viral
antigens as well as electron microscopy evidence of
the replicating virus correlated with pathology in the
lymphoid tissues, skin, oral mucosa, gastrointestinal
tract, reproductive system, and liver. Apoptosis was
a prominent observation in lymphoid tissues, with
a striking loss of T cells observed. The cause of this
widespread apoptosis remains unknown. However,
strong production of proinflammatory cytokines at
least in part likely contributed to the upregulation
of various proapoptotic genes. The strong upregula-
tion of cytokines may also have contributed to the
development of a hemorrhagic diathesis. The detec-
tion of D-dimers and other changes in hematologic
parameters in monkeys that developed classical or
hemorrhagic smallpox suggests that activation of the
coagulation cascade is a component of both disease
syndromes. In human populations, however, the oc-
currence of hemorrhagic smallpox was approximately
1% to 3% of the total cases observed.
Pathogenesis
Most knowledge about smallpox pathogenesis is
inferred from animal studies of mousepox, 25,26 rab-
bitpox, 26 and monkeypox 27,28 in their respective hosts,
and from vaccinia in humans. Studies using primates
infected with variola 29 corroborate these findings and
lend further insight into human smallpox and monkey-
pox infections. In both natural and experimental infec-
tions, the virus is introduced via the respiratory tract,
where it first seeds the mucous membranes, including
membranes of the eye, and then passes into local lymph
nodes. The first round of replication occurs in the lymph
nodes, followed by a transient viremia, which seeds tis-
sues, especially those of the reticuloendothelial system,
219
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin