Peter Beatson - Viking Shield From Archaeology (2008).pdf

(814 KB) Pobierz
Viking Shields
Viking Shields
To Buy Viking Jewellery, Outfits, and Equipment- click here
The 'Viking Shield' from Archaeology
Peter Beatson - NVG Miklagard
Introduction
The large circular shield of the Vikings was part of a conservative tradition of manufacture. The best
known intact examples from the Viking Age are those that lined the gunwales of the buried warship
from Gokstad, Norway ( Fig. 1 ) dated to c.905 AD (Bonde and Christensen 1993). They are similar to
shields from Thorsberg bog (Raddatz 1987) and other Danish weapon deposits of the Roman Iron Age.
Though archaeological evidence dries up with the adoption of Christian burial rites, art sources (such as
the Lewis chessmen) indicate that kite shields were accepted in the Norse lands in the twelfth century,
along with a small round buckler (Karlsson 1993). Scandinavian settlers seem to have adopted different
(native Insular?) designs in the Irish Sea region, judging by material from burials there. These variants
may be discussed in a separate paper.
Construction and dimensions
Decoration
Boss
Combat Techniques
Handle or grip
Tables
Edge Reinforcement
Bibliography
Other Fixtures
Footnotes
Construction and dimensions
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/shield/shield.html (1 of 20)10/6/2003 3:11:58 PM
9214907.008.png 9214907.009.png
Viking Shields
Shields were typically 80-90 cm in diameter [ 1 ] ( Table 1 ). The board was flat, and made of a single
layer of planks butted together. The Gokstad shields were made of seven or eight white pine [ 2 ] planks
of varying widths [ 3 ]. The planks were usually only 6-10mm thick ( Table 2 ), and were bevelled even
thinner at the outer edge ( Fig. 1 ; Table 2 ). There is no archaeological evidence for laminated (ie. cross-
ply) construction (Härke 1981) though contemporary poetry and slightly later legislation suggests it
(Dickinson and Härke 1992; Nicolaysen 1882).
Figure 1 - Shield from Gokstad ship burial, Westfold Norway c.905AD. Diameter 94 cm
(Nicolaysen 1882). a. Front. Boss type is Rygh 564. b. Reverse, note holes for attachment
of rim and single wooden crossbar serving as grip - the other reinforcements seen in
photographs are modern additions. c. Cross section, note bevelled edges.
The planks were possibly glued together. Extra support could come from the boss, grip and rim
bindings (see below), and from a leather covering. At least some shields from Birka had a thin leather
facing, and some earlier English shields were covered on both sides (Arwidsson 1986; Dickinson and
Härke 1992). However, the planks of the Gokstad shields were painted , indicating that they had no
leather facing covering them (Lowe 1990). It is worth noting that their uniform and fragile design
suggests that the Gokstad shields may have been ornaments made especially for the burial, and thus not
representative of actual combat shields [ 4 ].
An interesting parallel to the Gokstad shields comes from a peat bog at Tirskom, in Latvia. Dated to the
ninth century, this near intact shield is constructed of six spruce or fir planks (Yrtan 1961) and covered
on front and rear with leather, padded with pressed grass.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/shield/shield.html (2 of 20)10/6/2003 3:11:58 PM
9214907.010.png 9214907.011.png
Viking Shields
Boss
At the centre of the shield was a circular hole [ 5 ] covered by a more-or-less hemispherical iron boss of
~15 cm diameter (including flange), which enclosed the hand grip. The iron of the dome was fairly
thick (3-5 mm), though the flange was somewhat thinner (Lowe 1990; Manx Museum, Douglas Man:
pers. obs. 1994; Musee des Antiquites Nationales, St. Germain-en-Laye France: pers. obs. 1994).
Bosses had two main forms - the early style had a high dome and a pronounced neck (Type Rygh (R)
564: Fig. 2-a ). The later style, low domed without a neck (R562: Fig. 2-b ), never completely replaced
the former (Graham-Campbell 1980). Less common were a squat style (R563: Fig. 2-c ) and a sub-
conical style (R565: Fig. 2-d ), sometimes with an apical knob (Arwidsson 1986).
Figure 2 - Shield bosses, Rygh classification scheme. a. R564. b. R562. c. R563. d. R565.
From Arwidsson (1986).
Single examples of bosses with a toothed flange are known from Telemark, Norway ( Fig. 3-a ); Birka,
Sweden; and Ile de Groix, France ( Fig. 3-e ). In the latter burial, some unique bosses with elaborate
flanges were found ( Fig. 3-b,c,d,e ). These bosses might have had a Western European origin (Müller-
Wille 1978).
The boss was normally attached by broad headed iron nails, the points of which were either clenched
(bent over) or flattened on the reverse of the shield ( Fig. 3-d,h ). In the Birka material four nails was
most common (Arbman 1940-3), occasionally six (as for the Gokstad shields). Five nails were
sometimes used, as in examples from Cronk Moar, Man and the ship cremation on the Ile de Groix,
France (Bersu and Wilson 1966; Müller-Wille 1978).
The flange of some bosses were angled, perhaps to secure the boss to the board by placing tension on
the nails (Dickinson and Härke 1992), or possibly because they were attached to convex shield boards.
Flanges with decorative edgings of non-ferrous metal strips were found in some Birka graves ( Fig. 3-f,
g ), and nail heads were sometimes inlaid or tinned (Arwidsson 1986).
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/shield/shield.html (3 of 20)10/6/2003 3:11:58 PM
9214907.001.png 9214907.002.png 9214907.003.png
 
Viking Shields
Figure 3 - Shield bosses. a. Boss with toothed flange, Telemark Norway (Oslo
Olsaksamlingen, pers. obs.). b-e. Ile de Groix, France. Nail points were flattened rather
than clenched (from Müller-Wille 1978). f. Birka Bj544, showing tin applique on flange; g.
Birka Bj850, brass edging on flange; h. Birka Bj581, side view showing nails clenched
(bent) for attachment (after Arbmann 1940).
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/shield/shield.html (4 of 20)10/6/2003 3:11:58 PM
9214907.004.png 9214907.005.png
Viking Shields
Handle or grip
Wood alone must have been used in the majority of graves where remains are lacking, as in the Gokstad
shields where a thin lath of rectangular section is nailed (crossways with respect to the planks) from
edge to edge across the back face, it serves as a handle where it crosses the central hole ( Fig. l ). On
more elaborate shields a wooden core was covered by a gutter-shaped sheathing of iron (Arwidsson
1986), usually ornamented with embossed bronze sheet or silver inlay ( Fig 4-a ).
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/shield/shield.html (5 of 20)10/6/2003 3:11:58 PM
9214907.006.png 9214907.007.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin