Principles of Medical Statistics - A. Feinstein (CRC, 2002) WW.pdf

(25323 KB) Pobierz
62660462 UNPDF
PRINCIPLES OF
MEDICAL
Alvan R. Feinstein, M.D.
CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC
A CRC Press Company
Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C.
© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC
STATISTICS
62660462.051.png 62660462.062.png
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Feinstein, Alvan R., 1925–
Principles of medical statistics / Alvan R. Feinstein.
p. ; cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-58488-216-6 (alk. paper)
1. Medicine—Statistical methods.
[DNLM: 1. Statistics—methods. 2. Data Interpretation,
Statistical. WA 950 F299p 2001] I. Title.
R853.S7 F45 2001
610'.7'27—dc21
2001001794
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with
permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish
reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials
or for the consequences of their use.
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior
permission in writing from the publisher.
The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works,
or for resale. Specific permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press LLC for such copying.
Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC, 2000 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, Florida 33431.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation, without intent to infringe.
Visit the CRC Press Web site at www.crcpress.com
© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC
No claim to original U.S. Government works
International Standard Book Number 1-58488-216-6
Library of Congress Card Number 2001001794
Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
Printed on acid-free paper
© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC
62660462.070.png 62660462.071.png 62660462.001.png 62660462.002.png 62660462.003.png 62660462.004.png 62660462.005.png 62660462.006.png 62660462.007.png 62660462.008.png 62660462.009.png 62660462.010.png 62660462.011.png 62660462.012.png 62660462.013.png 62660462.014.png 62660462.015.png
Preface
What! Yet another book on medical biostatistics! Why? What for?
The purpose of this preface is to answer those questions and to add a few other pertinent
remarks. The sections that follow describe a series of distinctions, some of them unique,
that make this book different from other texts.
Goals and Objectives
The goal of the text is to get biomedical readers to think about data and statistical
procedures, rather than learn a set of “cook-book recipes.” In many statistics books aimed
at medical students or biomedical researchers, the readers are believed to have either
little interest or limited attention. They are then offered a simple, superficial account of
the most common doctrines and applications of statistical theory. The “get-it-over-with-
quickly” approach has been encouraged and often necessitated by the short time given
to statistics in modern biomedical education. The curriculum is supposed to provide
fundamental background for the later careers of medical and other graduate students,
but the heavily stressed “basic science” topics are usually cellular and molecular biology.
If included at all, statistics is usually presented briefly, as a drudgery to be endured
mainly because pertinent questions may appear in subsequent examinations for licensure
or other certifications.
Nevertheless, in later professional activities, practicing clinicians and biomedical
researchers will constantly be confronted with reports containing statistical expressions
and analyses. The practitioners will regularly see and use statistical results when making
clinical decisions in patient care; and the researchers will regularly be challenged by
statistical methods when planning investigations and appraising data. For these activities,
readers who respect their own intellects, and who want to understand and interpret the
statistical procedures, cannot be merely passive learners and compliant appliers of doc-
trinaire customs. The readers should think about what they want, need, and receive. They
should also recognize that their knowledge of the substantive biomedical phenomena is
a major strength and dominant factor in determining how to get, organize, and evaluate
the data. This book is aimed at stimulating and contributing to those thoughts.
Another distinction of the text is that the author is a physician with intimate and
extensive experience in both patient care and biomedical investigation. I had obtained a
master's degree in mathematics before entering medical school, but thereafter my roots
were firmly and irrevocably grounded in clinical medicine. When I later began doing
clinical research and encountering statistical strategies, my old mathematical background
saved me from being intimidated by established theories and dogmas. Although not all
statisticians will approve the temerity of an “unauthorized” writer who dares to compose
a text in which the fundamental basis of old statistical traditions is sometimes questioned,
© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC
62660462.016.png 62660462.017.png 62660462.018.png 62660462.019.png 62660462.020.png 62660462.021.png 62660462.022.png 62660462.023.png 62660462.024.png 62660462.025.png 62660462.026.png 62660462.027.png 62660462.028.png 62660462.029.png 62660462.030.png 62660462.031.png 62660462.032.png
other statisticians may be happy to know more about the substantive issues contained in
biomedical research, to learn what their clients are (or should be) thinking about, and to
lead or collaborate in developing the new methods that are sometimes needed.
New Methods and Approaches
The text contains many new methods and approaches that have been made possible by
advances in statistical strategy for both analytic description and inferential decisions.
Statistical description has traditionally relied on certain mathematical models, such as
the Gaussian distribution of a “normal” curve, that summarize data with means, standard
deviations, and arbitrarily constructed histograms. Readers who begin to think about what
they really want, however, may no longer happily accept what is offered by those old
models. For example, because biomedical data seldom have a Guassian distribution, the
median is usually a much better summary value than the mean ; and new forms of data
display — the stem-and-leaf plot and the box plot — not only are superior to histograms,
but are more natural forms of expression.
Another descriptive distinction, which is omitted or blurred in many text books, is the
difference between a trend (for citing correlation or regression) and a concordance (for
citing agreement). Investigators who study variability in observers or in laboratory pro-
cedures have usually been taught to express results with the conventional indexes of
“association” that denote trend, but not concordance. This text emphasizes the difference
between correlation and agreement; and separate chapters are devoted to both “nondi-
rectional” concordance (for observer variability) and “directional” concordance (for accu-
racy of marker tests).
In statistical inference for decisions about probability, the customary approach has used
hard-to-understand mathematical theories and hypothetical assumptions that were devel-
oped, established, and entrenched (for topics such as t tests and chi-square tests), because
they led to standard formulas for relatively simple calculations. During the past few
decades, however, the elaborate mathematical theories and assumptions have been aug-
mented, and sometimes replaced, by easy-to-understand new methods, which use rear-
rangements or resamplings of the observed data. The new methods often require
formidable calculations that were not practical in the pre-computer era; but today, the
“computer-intensive” work can be done quickly and easily, requiring no more effort than
pushing the right “button” for an appropriate program. The new methods, which may
eventually replace the old ones, are discussed here as additional procedures that involve
no complicated mathematical backgrounds or unrealistic assumptions about “parametric”
sampling from a theoretical population. In the new methods — which have such names as
Fisher exact test , bootstrap , and jackknife — all of the rearrangements, resamplings, and
statistical decisions about probability come directly from the empirical real-world data.
Another departure from tradition is a reappraisal of the use of probability itself, with
discussions of what a reader really wants to know, which is stability of the numbers, not
just probabilistic assessments.
The text also has sections that encourage methods of “physical diagnosis” to examine
the data with procedures using only common sense and in-the-head-without-a-calculator
appraisals. From appropriate summary statistics and such graphic tactics as box-plot
displays, a reader can promptly see what is in the data and can then make some simple,
© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC
62660462.033.png 62660462.034.png 62660462.035.png 62660462.036.png 62660462.037.png 62660462.038.png 62660462.039.png 62660462.040.png 62660462.041.png 62660462.042.png 62660462.043.png 62660462.044.png 62660462.045.png 62660462.046.png 62660462.047.png 62660462.048.png 62660462.049.png 62660462.050.png
effective, mental calculations. The results will often offer a crude but powerful check on
more complex mathematical computations.
A particularly novel and valuable approach is the careful dissection (and proposed
elimination) of the term statistical significance , which has been a source of major confusion
and intellectual pathogenicity throughout 20th-century science. Statistical significance is an
ambiguous term, because it does not distinguish between the theoretical stochastic signif -
icance of calculated probabilities (expressed as P values and confidence intervals) and the
pragmatic quantitative significance or clinical importance of the “effect sizes” found in
the observed results. Not only is the crucial difference between stochastic and quantitative
significance emphasized and thoroughly discussed, but also a special chapter, absent from
conventional texts, is devoted to the indexes of contrast used for expressing and evaluating
the “effect size” of quantitative distinctions.
Two other unique features of this text are the following:
• Two chapters on the display of statistical data in tables, charts, and graphs
contain good and bad examples that can be helpful to readers, investigators, and
the artists who prepare medical illustrations.
• A chapter that discusses the challenges of evaluating “equivalence” rather than
“superiority” also considers the management of problems that arise when dis-
cordance arises in what the investigator wants, what the results show, and what
the statistical tests produce.
Sequence, Scope, Rigor, and Orientation
The text is arranged in a logical sequence of basic principles that advance from simple to
more elaborate activities. It moves from evaluating one group of data to comparing two
groups and then associating two variables. Thereafter, the scope extends into more com-
plex but important topics that frequently appear as challenges in biomedical literature:
controversies about stochastic issues in choosing one- or two-tailed tests, the graphic
patterns of survival analysis, and the problems of appraising “power,” determining
“equivalence,” and adjudicating “multiple hypotheses.”
Nevertheless, despite some of the cited deviations from customary biostatistical dis-
course, the text describes all the conventional statistical procedures and offers reasonably
rigorous accounts of many of their mathematical justifications. Whether retaining or reject-
ing the conventional procedures, a reader should know what they do, how they do it, and
why they have been chosen to do it. Besides, the conventional procedures will continue
to appear in biomedical literature for many years. Learning the mechanisms (and limita-
tions) of the traditional tactics will be an enlightened act of self-defense.
Finally, although the conventional mathematical principles are given a respectful
account, the book has a distinctly clinical orientation. The literary style is aimed at bio-
medical readers; and the examples and teaching exercises all come from the real-world
medical phenomena. The readers are not expected to become statisticians, although appro-
priate historical events are sometimes cited and occasional mathematical challenges are
sometimes offered. Clinical and biomedical investigators have made many contributions
to other “basic” domains, such as cell and molecular biology, and should not be discour-
aged from helping the development of another “basic” domain, particularly the bio -portion
© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC
62660462.052.png 62660462.053.png 62660462.054.png 62660462.055.png 62660462.056.png 62660462.057.png 62660462.058.png 62660462.059.png 62660462.060.png 62660462.061.png 62660462.063.png 62660462.064.png 62660462.065.png 62660462.066.png 62660462.067.png 62660462.068.png 62660462.069.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin