chap06.pdf

(3306 KB) Pobierz
372859873 UNPDF
6
Converter Circuits
We have already analyzed the operation of a number of different types of converters: buck, boost,
buck–boost, , voltage-source inverter, etc. With these converters, a number of different functions can
be performed: step-down of voltage, step-up, inversion of polarity, and conversion of dc to ac or vice-
versa.
It is natural to ask, Where do these converters come from? What other converters occur, and
what other functions can be obtained? What are the basic relations between converters? In this chapter,
several different circuit manipulations are explored, which explain the origins of the basic converters.
Inversion of source and load transforms the buck converter into the boost converter. Cascade connection
of converters, and simplification of the resulting circuit, shows how the buck–boost and converters
are based on the buck and the boost converters. Differential connection of the load between the outputs
of two or more converters leads to a single-phase or polyphase inverter. A short list of some of the better
known converter circuits follows this discussion.
Transformer-isolated dc–dc converters are also covered in this chapter. Use of a transformer
allows isolation and multiple outputs to be obtained in a dc-dc converter, and can lead to better converter
optimization when a very large or very small conversion ratio is required. The transformer is modeled as
a magnetizing inductance in parallel with an ideal transformer; this allows the analysis techniques of the
previous chapters to be extended to cover converters containing transformers. A number of well-known
isolated converters, based on the buck, boost, buck–boost, single-ended primary inductance converter
(SEPIC), and are listed and discussed.
Finally, the evaluation, selection, and design of converters to meet given requirements are con-
sidered. Important performance-related attributes of transformer-isolated converters include: whether the
transformer reset process imposes excessive voltage stress on the transistors, whether the converter can
supply a high-current output without imposing excessive current stresses on the secondary-side compo-
nents, and whether the converter can be well-optimized to operate with a wide range of operating points,
372859873.023.png 372859873.024.png 372859873.025.png
132
Converter Circuits
that is, with large tolerances in and Switch utilization is a simplified figure-of-merit that mea-
sures the ratio of the converter output power to the total transistor voltage and current stress. As the
switch utilization increases, the converter efficiency increases while its cost decreases. Isolated convert-
ers with large variations in operating point tend to utilize their power devices more poorly than noniso-
lated converters which function at a single operating point. Computer spreadsheets are a good tool for
optimization of power stage designs and for trade studies to select a converter topology for a given appli-
cation.
6.1
CIRCUIT MANIPULATIONS
The buck converter (Fig. 6.1) was developed in Chapter 1 using basic principles. The switch reduces the
voltage dc component, and the low-pass filter removes the switching harmonics. In the continuous con-
duction mode, the buck converter has a conversion ratio of M = D. The buck converter is the simplest and
most basic circuit, from which we will derive other converters.
6.1.1
Inversion of Source and Load
Let us consider first what happens when we interchange the power input and power output ports of a con-
verter. In the buck converter of Fig. 6.2(a), voltage is applied at port 1, and voltage appears at port
2. We know that
This equation can be derived using the principle of inductor volt-second balance, with the assumption
that the converter operates in the continuous conduction mode. Provided that the switch is realized such
that this assumption holds, then Eq. (6.1) is true regardless of the direction of power flow.
So let us interchange the power source and load, as in Fig. 6.2(b). The load, bypassed by the
capacitor, is connected to converter port 1, while the power source is connected to converter port 2.
Power now flows in the opposite direction through the converter. Equation (6.1) must still hold; by solv-
ing for the load voltage one obtains
So the load voltage is greater than the source voltage. Figure 6.2(b) is a boost converter, drawn back-
wards. Equation 6.2 nearly coincides with the familiar boost converter result,
except that
is replaced by D.
Since power flows in the opposite direction, the standard buck converter unidirectional switch
372859873.026.png 372859873.001.png 372859873.002.png 372859873.003.png 372859873.004.png 372859873.005.png 372859873.006.png
6.1 Circuit Manipulations
133
realization cannot be used with the circuit of Fig. 6.2(b). By following the discussion of Chapter 4, one
finds that the switch can be realized by connecting a transistor between the inductor and ground, and a
diode from the inductor to the load, as shown in Fig. 6.2(c). In consequence, the transistor duty cycle D
becomes the fraction of time which the single-pole double-throw (SPDT) switch of Fig. 6.2(b) spends in
position 2, rather than in position 1. So we should interchange D with its complement in Eq. (6.2), and
the conversion ratio of the converter of Fig. 6.2(c) is
Thus, the boost converter can be viewed as a buck converter having the source and load connections
exchanged, and in which the switch is realized in a manner that allows reversal of the direction of power
flow.
372859873.007.png 372859873.008.png 372859873.009.png
134
Converter Circuits
6.1.2
Cascade Connection of Converters
Converters can also be connected in cascade, as illustrated in Fig. 6.3 [1,2]. Converter 1 has conversion
ratio
such that its output voltage is
This voltage is applied to the input of the second converter. Let us assume that converter 2 is driven with
the same duty cycle D applied to converter 1. If converter 2 has conversion ratio
then the output
voltage V is
Substitution of Eq. (6.4) into Eq. (6.5) yields
Hence, the conversion ratio M ( D ) of the composite converter is the product of the individual conversion
ratios and
Let us consider the case where converter 1 is a buck converter, and converter 2 is a boost con-
verter. The resulting circuit is illustrated in Fig. 6.4. The buck converter has conversion ratio
The boost converter has conversion ratio
So the composite conversion ratio is
372859873.010.png 372859873.011.png 372859873.012.png 372859873.013.png 372859873.014.png 372859873.015.png 372859873.016.png 372859873.017.png 372859873.018.png 372859873.019.png
6.1 Circuit Manipulations
135
The composite converter has a noninverting buck–boost conversion ratio. The voltage is reduced when
D < 0.5, and increased when D> 0.5.
The circuit of Fig. 6.4 can be simplified considerably. Note that inductors and along with
capacitor form a three-pole low-pass filter. The conversion ratio does not depend on the number of
poles present in the low-pass filter, and so the same steady-state output voltage should be obtained when
a simpler low-pass filter is used. In Fig. 6.5(a), capacitor is removed. Inductors and are now in
series, and can be combined into a single inductor as shown in Fig. 6.5(b). This converter, the noninvert-
ing buck–boost converter, continues to exhibit the conversion ratio given in Eq. (6.9).
The switches of the converter of Fig. 6.5(b) can also be simplified, leading to a negative output
voltage. When the switches are in position 1, the converter reduces to Fig. 6.6(a). The inductor is con-
nected to the input source
and energy is transferred from the source to the inductor. When the
372859873.020.png 372859873.021.png 372859873.022.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin