CQO7.pdf

(164 KB) Pobierz
1866643 UNPDF
CoherenceandQuantumOpticsVII ,Eds.J.H.Eberly,L.Mandel,andE.Wolf
Plenum,NewYork1996,p.313
THEPHOTONWAVEFUNCTION
IwoBialynicki-Birula
CenterforTheoreticalPhysics,PolishAcademyofSciences
Lotnik¶ow32/46,02-668Warsaw,Polandand
AbteilungfÄurQuantenphysik,UniversitÄatUlm,89069Ulm,Germany
INTRODUCTION
Quantizationoftheelectromagnetic¯eldistraditionallyintroducedatthelevelofsecondquan-
tization:theclassical¯eldvariablesarereplacedby¯eldoperators.Ibelievethatthereasonswhy
a¯rst-quantizedtheoryofphotonshasneverbeenfullydevelopedaremainlyhistorical.HadDirac
discoveredhisrelativisticwaveequation[1]priortohisquantizationoftheelectromagnetic¯eld[2],he
wouldhavenoticedandmostprobablyfurtherexploredagreatsimilaritybetweenthewaveequation
fortheelectron(orevenbetterfortheneutrino)andtheMaxwellequations.Asithappened,this
similaritywasnoticedlater(forthe¯rsttimeapparentlybyMajorana[3])andplayednoroleinthe
developmentofthequantumtheoryofelectromagnetismbecausethequantizedelectromagnetic¯eld
hasbeenintroducedfromtheverybeginningandaccountedforallquantumpropertieselectromag-
neticradiation.Subsequentlyquantumelectrodynamicshasbecomesosuccessfulinexplainingwith
utmostaccuracyallexperimentswithinitsrangeofapplicabilitythattherewasnoneedtosearchfor
analternativeformulationthatwouldemploytheconceptofthephotonwavefunction.Considering
ourtrustinquantumelectrodynamicsandourfamiliaritywithitsformalapparatusonemayevenask
ifthereisanyjusti¯cationatallfor,whatitessentiallyamountsto,areconstructionofthenotionof
thephotonfunctionfromQED,onlytofaceanotsofamiliarobjectwhosepropertiesareyettobe
uncovered.
Icanseethreereasonswhytheintroductionofaphotonwavefunctionisworththee®ort.First
ofall,oneachievesauni¯eddescriptionofallparticles(massiveandmassless)atbothlevels(¯rst
andsecond)ofquantization.Thisisparticularlyattractivefromthepedagogicalpointofviewsince
onecanusethesamemathematicaltoolstostudythequantumpropertiesofmassiveandmassless
particles.Second,variousaspectsofthephotondynamics(forexample,theangularmomentumof
thephoton,evanescentwaves,orthepropagationofphotonsinnoninertialframesofreference)can
bedescribedmuchmoreeasilywithintheframeworkofphotonwavemechanicswithoutbringingin
theformalismof¯eldquantization.Third,armedwiththeconceptofthephotonwavefunctionand
allthetoolsofthestandardwavemechanics,onecancomeupwithsomenewmethodsofdescribing
photons.Forexample,onecanstudyquantummechanicaleigenvalueproblemsforthephotons,one
canintroduceananalogoftheWignerfunctionforthephoton,andonecan¯ndacounterpartofthe
hydrodynamicformulationofwavemechanicsforphotons.MuchofwhatIwillsayhereisnotnew;
itcanbeobtainedby"reverseengineering"fromtextbooksonquantumelectrodynamics.Therewill
be,however,asigni¯cantchangeinemphasisleadingtosomenewconclusions.
Photonwavefunctionsappearindisguiseinthestandardformulationofquantumelectrodynamics
asthecoe±cients(calledmodefunctions)inanexpansionoftheelectromagnetic¯eldoperatorsinto
photoncreationandannihilationoperators.Ittakessomee®orttorecognizegenuinewavefunctions
inthesecoe±cientfunctionssincethemodefunctionsarealwaysassumedtodescribemonochromatic
radiation[4{7].Thus,contrarytothespiritofwavemechanics,arbitrarysuperpositionsofthemode
functionsareforbiddensincethey,ingeneral,leadtononstationarywavepackets.Thisrestriction
may,however,beremoved(seeforexample[8]);theonlyessentialpropertyofthecoe±cientfunctions
beingthattheyformacomplete(andpreferablyalsoanorthonormal)set.
Inthispaper,Ishallarguethatnotonlyonemayreconstructphotonwavefunctionsfromstandard
quantumelectrodynamicsbutthatonecansetupaconsistentwavemechanicsofphotonsthatcould
beusedtodescribevariousquantume®ects, independently oftheformalismofsecondquantization.
Inotherwords,inconstructingafullquantumtheoryofphotonsonemayalsoproceed,asinquantum
theoryofmassiveparticles,throughtwostages.Atthe¯rststageoneintroduceswavefunctionsanda
waveequationobeyedbythesewavefunctions.Atthesecondstageoneupgradesthewavefunctions
tothelevelof¯eldoperatorsinordertodealmoree®ectivelywithstatesinvolvingmanyparticlesand
toallowforprocessesinwhichthenumberofparticlesisnotconserved.
Theveryconceptofthephotonwavefunctionisnotnew,butstrangelyenoughithasneverbeen
systematicallyexplored.Manytextbooksonquantummechanicsstarttheintroductiontoquantum
theorywithadiscussionofphotonpolarizationmeasurements(cf.forexample[9{12])butacomplete
photonwavefunctionnevermakesitsappearance,asifthenotionofawavefunctionwasrestricted
onlytothedescriptionofthepolarizationstatesinasimpletwo-dimensionalHilbertspaceandcould
notdescribethephotonpropagationinfull.Insometextbooks(cf.forexample[13{15])thepossibility
ofintroducingaspace-dependentwavefunctionforthephotonisevenexplicitlyrejected.
Ishallintroduceawavefunctionforthephotonbyrevivingandextendingthemodeofdescription
oftheelectromagnetic¯eldbasedonthecomplexformoftheMaxwellequationsknownalready
toRiemann[16,17].Thecomplexvectorthatappearsinthisdescriptionwillbeshowntohavethe
propertiesthatonewouldassociatewithaone-photonwavefunction,includingofcourseaprobabilistic
interpretation.Additionalpropertiesofthephotonwavefunctionaredescribedinmyrecentarticle
[18]whileitsrelationtofullquantumelectrodynamicsisdiscussedinourbook[8].
TheapproachadoptedhereistobecontrastedwiththatofLandauandPeierls[19]andCook[20].
TheLandau-PeierlsandCookwavefunctionsarehighlynonlocalobjects.Theno n localityinspace
isintroducedbydividingtheFouriertransformoftheelectromagnetic¯eldby
p
PHOTONWAVEFUNCTIONANDITSTIMEEVOLUTION
MydiscussionofthephotonwavefunctionbeginswithwritingtheMaxwellequationforahomo-
geneousmediuminacompactform
i@ t F(r ;t )= cr£ F(r ;t ) ; (1)
F(r ;t )=0 ;
(2)
bycombining,asRiemannhavedone,tworealvectorsDandBintoonecomplex-valuedvectorF,
F(r ;t )= 1
2
p ² 0 + i B(r ;t )
p ¹ 0
: (3)
Thesquarerootsof ² and ¹ areneededtomatchthedimensionsofthetwotermsandanadditional
factorof1 = 2isintroducedforfutureconvenience.
Theevolutionequation(1)forFandthetransversalitycondition(2)canalsobewritteninamatrix
form
³
s ¢ 1
´
i@ t F= c
i r
F ; (4)
(s ¢r ) s j F= r j F ; (5)
where s i 'sarethespinmatricesforaspin-1particle
( s i ) kl = ¡i" ikl ;
(6)
k (cf.Eq.(43)).
IthasbeenalreadynotedbyPauli[21],thatthesenonlocalwavefunctionshaveaseriousdrawback
sincetheydonottransformunderLorentztransformationsaswell-de¯nedlocalgeometricobjects;
theirvaluestakenatapointinonecoordinatesystemdependonalltheirvaluesinanothercoordinate
system.
µ D(r ;t )
1866643.001.png
0
1
0
1
0
1
000
00 ¡i
0 i 0
00 i
000
¡i 00
0 ¡i 0
i 00
000
s x =
@
A ;s y =
@
A ;s z =
@
A : (7)
UponthemultiplicationofbothsidesofEq.(4)by¹ h ,onecanconvertittotheSchrÄodingerform
i ¹ h@ t F= H F ´c (s ¢ p)F ; (8)
wherep=(¹ h=i ) r .Thescalarproduct c s ¢ pplaystheroleoftheHamiltonianinwavemechanicsof
thephoton.Note,that c smayalsobeinterpretedasavelocityoperatorsince( i= ¹ h )[r ;H ]= c s.
Theform(8)ofthewaveequationisquiteuniversal.ReplacingthematricessbythePaulimatrices
oneobtainstheWeylequationforthewavefunctionofaneutrino[22].Withtheappropriatechoice
ofspinmatrices,thewaveequationsforhigher-spinmasslessparticlescanalsobecastintothisform
(cf.forexample[23]).Upontheidenti¯cationofthecomponentsofthevectorFwithcomponentsof
asymmetricrelativisticspinor Á AB
Á 00 = ¡F x + iF y ; Á 01 = F z ; Á 11 = F x + iF y ; (9)
Maxwellequationsbecomeamemberofauniversalsetofrelativisticwaveequationsdescribingthe
propagationofmasslessparticlesofanyspin.Alltheseequationshavetheform[23]
¾ ¹C 0 A r ¹ Á AB 1 B 2 ¢¢¢B 1 =0 ; (10)
wherefourmatrices ¾ ¹A 0 B representarelativisticextensionofPaulimatrices( ¾ 0 istheunitmatrix
andtheremainingonesareordinaryPaulimatrices).Thisuniversalityprovidesastrongargumentin
favorofinterpretingthesolutionsofEq.(4)asphotonwavefunctions.Afterallonehasnoqualms
aboutacceptingthesolutionsoftheWeylequationasneutrinowavefunctions.
Eqs.(4)and(5)arecompletelyequivalenttotheMaxwellequationsbutwhentreatedasthe
equationsforthephotonwavefunctiontheysu®erfromoneseriousshortcoming:theypossessonly
halfofthepositive-energysolutionsneededtodescribeallpolarizationstatesofaphoton.Thesame
istrueinthegeneralcase;Eqs.(10)describeonlyleft-handedparticles.
Positiveenergysolutionsareidenti¯edasthosesolutionswhosewavefunctionhastheform
exp( ¡i!t )F(r)withpositivevaluesof ! .Thesubstitutionofthisforminto(4)yields
i r )F=¹ h! F : (11)
Thisequationsaysthatforpositiveenergysolutionsthehelicity,i.e.theprojectionofthespinofthe
photononthedirectionofitsmomentum,isalwayspositive.Thesignofhelicitycanbetracedback
tothechoiceofeitherForitscomplexconjugateasthephotonwavefunction.Thus,thechoiceofa
signoftheimaginarypartin(3)isequivalenttochoosingonehelicity(right-handedorleft-handed)
overtheother.Oneneeds,however,wavefunctionsofthephotonsofbothhelicitiestodescribe
bothcircularpolarizations:rightandleft.Thisrequiresadoublingofthewave-functioncomponents:
thetwohelicitieswillbedescribedbyupperandlowercomponentsof onewavefunction .Inempty
spacebothpolarizationstatespropagateindependently;thetwopartsofthephotonwavefunction
satisfytwoseparateevolutionequationswithoppositesignsoftheHamiltonian.Byintroducinga
six-componentwavefunction F madeofF § asitsupper/lowercomponents,
µ F +
F ¡
F =
;
(12)
thetwoevolutionequationscanbecombinedtogether
i ¹ h@ t F = 3 (s ¢ ¹ h
i r ) F; (13)
where ½ 3 isamemberofasetofPauli-typematrices ½ i .Thematrix ½ 3 givesplus/minussignwhen
actingonupper/lowercomponentswhile ½ 1 and ½ 2 (tobeusedlater)interchangethesecomponents.
Thedoublingofthecomponentsoftheelectronwavefunctionintherelativisticcase,ascompared
tothenonrelativisticcase,isjusti¯edbytheexistenceofantiparticles.Antiparticlesaredescribedby
thenegativeenergysolutionsoftheDiracequation.Photons,however,donothaveantiparticlesso
thatthenegativeenergypartofthewavefunctionshouldnotcarryanyadditionalinformation.The
doublingofthecomponentsofthewavefunction(12)requires,therefore,anauxiliaryconditionthat
restorestheoriginalnumberofdegreesoffreedom.Thisisachievedbydemandingthatthecomplex
conjugationofthewavefunctionhasthesamee®ectasaninterchangeofupperandlowercomponents,
c (s ¢ ¹ h
F = ½ 1 F ¤ :
(14)
Asanindependentquantityonemaytakejustthepositiveenergypart F (+) ofthewave¯eld F (called
theanalyticsignalinclassicaltheory).Thispartrepresentsthetruephotonwavefunctionandthat
partistobeidenti¯edwiththematrixelementsofthe¯eldoperatorsbetweenthevacuumstateand
one-photonstatesthatmaketheirappearanceinquantumelectrodynamics.
InwhatfollowsIshallusethesymbolªtodenotethepositiveenergypartofthefunction F .
Owingtothecondition(14),thenegativefrequencypartisobtainedbycomplexconjugationandby
aninterchangeoftheupperandlowercomponentsofthepositivefrequencypart.Inthelanguage
ofparticlephysics,complexconjugationcombinedwithmultiplicationby ½ 1 wouldbecalledcharge
conjugationandEq.(14)istheconditionofinvarianceunderchargeconjugation.
Maxwellequationswrittenintheform(13)exhibitacloseanalogywiththeDiracequationwritten
inthechiralrepresentationoftheDiracmatrices(cf.forexample[24,8]).Inthisrepresentationthe
four-componentwavefunction à ismadeoftworelativisticspinors Á and  |theanalogsofF + and
F ¡ |describingtwohelicities,
µ Á
Â
à =
:
(15)
TheDiracequationforinthisrepresentationtakestheform
³
¾¢ ¹ h
´
i ¹ h@ t à = 3
i r
à + mc 2 ½ 1 Ã: (16)
FortheDiracparticlethemasstermalwaysinducesamixingofthetwostatesofpolarizationwhile
forthephotons,asIshallshowlater,themixingisinducedonlybyanexternalin°uence,bythe
medium.
CONSERVEDQUANTITIESANDCORRESPONDINGQUANTUMOPERATORS
Ishalltrynowtomaketheprobabilisticinterpretationofthephotonwavefunctionªplausibleby
comparingtheexpressionsforbasicobservablesinclassicalandinquantumtheories.Thefundamental
conservedquantitiescharacterizingclassicalelectromagnetic¯eld|theenergy E ,themomentumP,
andtheangularmomentumM|aregivenasthefollowingspaceintegrals
Z
Z
Z
E =
d 3 rH (r) ; P=
d 3 rP (r) ; M=
d 3 r r £P (r) ; (17)
thatinvolvethelocaldensitiesofenergy H (r)andmomentum P (r)
H = D ¢ D
2 ² + B ¢ B
2 ¹ = F y ¢F;P =D £ B= F y ½ 3 s F=c: (18)
Theconservationlawsfor E ,P,andMfollowfromthecontinuityequationssatis¯edby H (r)and
P (r),
@ t H = ¡r¢S; @ t P i = ¡r k T ik ; (19)
where S istheenergy°uxand T ij istheMaxwellstresstensor,
S = cF y ½ 3 s F; T ij = F y ( s i s j + s j s i ) F¡± ij F y ¢F; (20)
providedthewavefunctionislocalizedinspacesothattheintegrationbypartsdoesnotintroduce
anyboundaryterms.
Now,Ishallanalyzetheenergy,momentum,andtheangularmomentumfromaquantummechanical
pointofviewapplyingthesamemethodsasinwavemechanicsofmassiveparticles,byexhibitingthe
correspondingoperators,theireigenvaluesandeigenfunctions.Thequantumoperatorsrepresenting
theseobservablesaretakentobe(cf. forexample[9])thegenerators(uptoafactorof¹ h=i )of
theappropriatein¯nitesimaltransformationsofthewavefunction.Thetimetranslationgivesthe
Hamiltonianortheenergy,spacetranslationsgivethemomentum,androtationsgivetheangular
momentum.
Themomentumoperator^panditseigenvalueproblemhaveexactlythesameformasinquantum
mechanicsofmassiveparticles
^p= ¹ h
i r; ¹ h
i @ i ª=¹ hk i ª ; (21)
where k i 'sarethecomponentsofawavevector.
ThetimeevolutionEq.(13)enablesonetoidentifythequantummechanicalHamiltonianoperator
^ H as,
^ H = 3 (s ¢ ^p) : (22)
Theeigenvalueproblemforthisoperatorhastheform
3 (s ¢ ¹ h
i r )ª=¹ h! ª : (23)
Thetotalangularmomentumoperatorforspinningparticlesconsistsoftwoparts:theorbital
angularmomentumandthespinangularmomentum,
^ J=^r £ ^p+¹ h s : (24)
Itisworthnotingthatitisthetotalangularmomentum ^ J,de¯nedasthesumoftheorbitalandthe
spinpart,thatcommuteswiththephotonHamiltonian(22)and,therefore,isaconstantofmotion.
Theeigenvalueproblemfortheangularmomentumcontains,asusual,theeigenvalueproblemforthe
z -componentofthetotalangularmomentum
^ J z ª=¹ hM ª ;
(25)
andtheeigenvalueproblemforthesquareofthetotalangularmomentum
^ J 2 ª=¹ h 2 J ( J +1)ª : (26)
ThesolutionsofEqs.(25)and(26)arewellknownvectorsphericalharmonics(cf.forexample[25,26]).
At¯rstlook,theclassicalexpressions(17)fortheenergy,momentum,andangularmomentumare
di®erentfromtheirquantummechanicalcounterparts.InthenextsectionIshallshowthatthesedif-
ferencescanbereconciledbyadoptinganappropriatemetricfortheevaluationofexpectationvalues.
EXPECTATIONVALUESANDTRANSITIONPROBABILITIES
Acorrespondencebetweenquantumandclassicaldescriptionsoftheradiation¯eldrequiresthat
theexpectationvaluesofthequantum-mechanicaloperators ^ H; ^p,orMbeequaltotheclassical
valuesofthe¯eldenergy,momentum,andangularmomentum.Ishallshowthatthiscanbeachieved
byanappropriatechoiceofthescalarproductforthewavefunctionsªusedintheconstructionof
expectationvalues.Tothisend,Iinvokethetransversalitycondition(5)forªtoobtainthefollowing
relations
^ 3 s =c ª=^pª ; ^ 3 ^r £ s =c ª=(^r £ ^p+s)ª : (27)
Withthehelpoftheserelations(afteradivisionby ^ H ),onecanwritetheclassicalquantities(17)in
theformofexpectationvaluesofthecorrespondingquantum-mechanicaloperators
E = hEi; P= h P i; M= h M i; (28)
where
Z
d 3 r ª y ^ H
Z
d 3 r ª y ^p
Z
d 3 r ª y ^r £ ^p+s
^ H ª : (29)
Alltheseexpressionsarebilinearinª,likeallexpectationvaluesinwavemechanicsofmassive
particles,andtheonlydi®erenceisasystematicappearanceoftheHamiltonianinthedenominator.
Therefore,itisnaturaltoassumethatthedivisionbytheHamiltonianshouldbeincludedinthe
de¯nitionoftheexpectationvaluesorinthede¯nitionofthescalarproduct h ª 1 j ª 2 i H oftwowave
functions,
hEi =
^ H ª ; h P i =
^ H ª ; h M i =
1
^ H ª 2 : (30)
Ihaveaddedthesubscript H inthesymbolofthescalarproductasareminderofthenecessary
divisionby ^ H .Withthisde¯nitionofthescalarproduct,oneobtains
Z
h ª 1 j ª 2 i H =
d 3 r ª y 1
hEi = h ª j ^ H ª i H ; h P i = h ª j ^pª i H ; h M i = h ª j (^r £ ^p+s)ª i H : (31)
1866643.002.png 1866643.003.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin